H.J.Res. 105

H.J.Res. 105: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to “North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan”.

Enacted — Signed by President Julie Fedorchak (R) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 105 is a bill that seeks to disapprove or overturn a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) concerning the 'North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan'. The specifics of the rule are not given, but it likely relates to land use and resource management decisions in North Dakota.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the bill in the media argue that it is necessary to overturn the BLM's rule to ensure local control over land use and resource management decisions. They believe that the federal government, through the BLM, is overstepping its bounds and infringing on state and local rights. They also argue that the rule may be harmful to local industries and economic development.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill in the media argue that the disapproval of the BLM's rule could lead to mismanagement of resources and potential environmental harm. They believe that the BLM's rule is necessary to ensure sustainable and responsible use of land and resources. Critics also express concerns that overturning the rule could set a dangerous precedent for undermining federal environmental and land management regulations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$67,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The bill H.J.Res. 105, sponsored by Julie Fedorchak, does not appear to present significant conflicts of interest based on the available data. The top donor industries for Fedorchak are Retired, Securities & Investment, and Government, none of which directly overlap with the subject matter of the bill, which pertains to a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management. While there has been lobbying activity in the bill's policy area, none of these entities are directly linked to Fedorchak's top donors. The largest lobbying contributions come from Iridium Satellite, LLC and Self-Help Movement, Inc., each contributing $10,000 and $15,000 respectively. However, there is no clear financial trail connecting these entities to Fedorchak's campaign financing. The lack of direct industry overlaps and clear financial connections suggest a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NEW YORK TRANSCO LLC HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $60,000
CITY OF BUFFALO, NY HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $40,000
COUNCIL FOR AFFORDABLE AND RURAL HOUSING HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $40,000
DELAWARE NORTH HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $30,000
AFRICAN COALITION FOR TRADE RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. $20,000
SELF-HELP MOVEMENT, INC MISSION GOVERNMENT RELATIONS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MUROFF LAW FIRM, LLC) $15,000
IRIDIUM SATELLITE, LLC GLOBAL TECH STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
INGLIS MISSION GOVERNMENT RELATIONS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MUROFF LAW FIRM, LLC) $10,000
SALVATION ARMY OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE MISSION GOVERNMENT RELATIONS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MUROFF LAW FIRM, LLC) $9,000
MANN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ON BEHALF OF CAVAROCCHI RUSCIO DENNIS ASSOC MISSION GOVERNMENT RELATIONS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MUROFF LAW FIRM, LLC) undisclosed
FLORIDA CRYSTALS CORP. RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed
CBI SUGAR GROUP RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL SUGAR TRADE COALITION RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed
MAURITIUS-U.S. BUSINESS ASSOCIATION, INC. RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed
MAURITIUS SUGAR SYNDICATE AND MAURITIUS CHAMBER OF AGRICULTURE RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Julie Fedorchak, ranked by total contributions.

Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0
Securities & Investment $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0
Government $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us