H.J.Res. 171

H.J.Res. 171: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Bulletin 2022-06: Unfair Return

Introduced Nikema Williams (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 171 is a joint resolution that seeks to disapprove a rule from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) regarding the withdrawal of a previous rule titled 'Bulletin 2022-06: Unfair Return.' This resolution is part of the congressional process to challenge or overturn regulations set by federal agencies.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 171 argue that reinstating the original rule is crucial for protecting consumers from unfair financial practices. They emphasize the importance of maintaining regulatory oversight to ensure fair treatment in financial transactions.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 171 contend that disapproving the CFPB's withdrawal of the rule could hinder financial innovation and create unnecessary regulatory burdens on businesses. They argue that the original rule may not effectively address consumer protection and could lead to unintended consequences in the financial market.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The bill H.J.Res. 171 is related to the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and there is no direct overlap between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, which are Health Professionals and Retired individuals. The sponsor, Nikema Williams, received $120,000,000 from Health Professionals and $37,500,000 from Retired individuals. However, there is lobbying activity in the bill's policy area from various organizations, the highest being from Hogan Lovells, LLP OBO Zhongji Innolight Co., Ltd. with $350,000. Despite this, none of these organizations are directly linked to the sponsor's top donors. Therefore, the risk of a conflict of interest is low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. MO STRATEGIES, INC. $350,000
RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VENN STRATEGIES $60,000
MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE US, LLC MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE US, LLC $30,000
CLARK STREET ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $30,000
IMPERIAL HEALTH MCWILLIAMS GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS CONSULTANTS $20,000
WILLIAMS & LAKE, LLC MCWILLIAMS GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS CONSULTANTS $20,000
KICKAPOO TRADITIONAL TRIBE OF TEXAS MCWILLIAMS GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS CONSULTANTS $20,000
CITY OF KOTZEBUE, ALASKA HOLLAND & HART LLP $10,000
SPACE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE, INC. SPACE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE, INC. undisclosed
MCKEES ROCKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CRANMER CONSULTANTS undisclosed
LYTEN, INC. JHS CONSULTING, INC undisclosed
SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY undisclosed
PRESERVATION ACTION PRESERVATION ACTION undisclosed
GOLD PR LTD. (ON BEHALF OF OJSC "BAKAI BANK") THROUGHLINE GLOBAL ADVISORS undisclosed
WORKIVA INC. LSN PARTNERS, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nikema Williams, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us