H.J.Res. 175

H.J.Res. 175: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Consumer Financial Protection C

Introduced Ritchie Torres (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 175 is a resolution that aims to disapprove a rule proposed by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) that would withdraw a previous consumer protection regulation. This resolution is introduced under the Congressional Review Act, which allows Congress to overturn rules issued by federal agencies.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 175 argue that disapproving the CFPB's withdrawal will help maintain essential consumer protections, ensuring that consumers are safeguarded from unfair financial practices. Advocates believe that these protections are vital for maintaining trust in the financial system and preventing exploitation.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 175 contend that this resolution undermines the CFPB's ability to adapt regulations based on current economic conditions and consumer needs. They argue that disapproving the withdrawal of the rule could hinder innovation in the financial sector and may lead to unnecessary regulatory burdens on financial institutions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

After a thorough analysis of the bill H.J.Res. 175 and its sponsor Ritchie Torres's campaign finance data, it appears that there are no direct overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. However, there has been significant lobbying activity in this bill's policy area. Notably, firms such as Vector, D-Wave Government, Inc., MBK Partners, Solution Philippines, LLC, and BAE, Kim & Lee, LLC have spent a total of $660,000 on lobbying through The McKeon Group, Inc. Other firms have also engaged in lobbying, but their expenditure amounts are undisclosed. Despite this lobbying activity, it is important to note that these firms are not directly linked to the sponsor's campaign finances, and as such, this does not necessarily indicate a conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
BAE, KIM & LEE, LLC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $370,000
MBK PARTNERS THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $150,000
B. BRAUN MEDICAL INC. POLSINELLI PC $70,000
VECTOR THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $40,000
SOLUTION PHILIPPINES, LLC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $40,000
AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION $35,000
D-WAVE GOVERNMENT, INC THE MCKEON GROUP, INC. $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RSVP PROGRAM DIRECTORS THE SUSQUEHANNA GROUP $5,000
STR8 CORPORATION BRODY GROUP L.L.C. PUBLIC AFFAIRS undisclosed
WEST GULF MARITIME ASSOCIATION WEST GULF MARITIME ASSOCIATION undisclosed
CENTRAL ADMIXTURE PHARMACY SERVICES, INC. POLSINELLI PC undisclosed
CARTRIDGE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
BLUE DIAMOND ATOMICS NATURAL STATE CONSULTING AND STRATEGIES undisclosed
POPLICUS INCORPORATED DBA GOVINI CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
STRYDENT AUTONOMOUS TECHNOLOGIES POTOMAC STRATEGIC CONSULTING LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ritchie Torres, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us