H.J.Res. 180

H.J.Res. 180: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to “Statement of Policy Regarding P

Introduced Sylvia Garcia (D) HOUSE_JOINT_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.J.Res. 180 is a joint resolution that aims to disapprove a rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB) concerning the withdrawal of a policy statement related to consumer protection. The resolution is intended to prevent the CFPB from eliminating this specific policy, which likely pertains to consumer financial practices or regulations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.J.Res. 180 argue that maintaining the CFPB's policy statement is essential for protecting consumers from unfair financial practices. They emphasize that disapproving the withdrawal helps ensure accountability and transparency within financial institutions, thereby strengthening consumer rights.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.J.Res. 180 contend that the resolution undermines the CFPB's ability to adapt and respond to changing economic conditions. They argue that keeping outdated policies may hinder innovation and flexibility in the financial sector, potentially leading to negative consequences for both consumers and businesses.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.J.Res. 180 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Sylvia Garcia's top donors and the subject matter of the bill, which concerns the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection's rule withdrawal. The absence of direct connections suggests a lower likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from the sponsor's financial backers. While there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, the lack of disclosed amounts and specific industry ties to the bill indicates that the potential for undue influence is minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not directly correlate with Garcia's financial support, thus reducing the perceived risk of conflict.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
DIRSHU INTERNATIONAL MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION $100,000
CEO WORKS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $45,000
KAZI IG SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $15,000
SOUTHERN FOLGER CONTRACTING BBT STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
WATERFRONT GLOBAL BBT STRATEGIES LLC $5,200
DIGITALEUROPE VIVID STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
DR. STEPHEN SOLOWAY MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ONE ISRAEL FUND MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HEMOGLOBIN OXYGEN THERAPEUTICS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
ATAOLLAH AMINPOUR MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
HERSEL NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MORAD BEN NEMAN MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
MARK SCOTT MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed
BORIS MINTS MERKAVA STRATEGIES CORPORATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sylvia Garcia, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us