The 'Flock-Off Act' (H.R. 10221) is a proposed law that aims to stop federal funds from being used to buy, install, or operate certain types of camera systems. These systems automatically capture and process images of vehicles, license plates, or individuals using technologies like machine learning or facial recognition. The bill requires federal agencies and recipients of federal funds to remove existing systems within 180 days of the law's enactment. Exceptions are made for cameras used within one mile of U.S. borders for border security and for toll collection systems on highways. Violations could result in the loss of federal funding until the misused funds are reimbursed. ([govscent.org](https://govscent.org/bill/USA/119hr10221ih?utm_source=openai))
H.R. 10221 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Thomas Massie (Republican) and is currently listed as “Introduced”. It is classified under the Government Operations and Politics policy area, one of 379 bills in that area we track this Congress.
Thomas Massie is the sponsor of 12 bills in our database this Congress, so H.R. 10221 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 10221 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Government Operations and Politics is 3.1/10.
Supporters of the 'Flock-Off Act' argue that it is a necessary step to protect individual privacy and prevent government overreach through surveillance technologies. They believe that restricting the use of federal funds for these camera systems will help safeguard civil liberties and reduce the potential for misuse of personal data. The bill's exceptions for border security and toll collection are seen as reasonable allowances that balance security needs with privacy concerns.
Critics of the 'Flock-Off Act' contend that the bill could hinder law enforcement efforts and public safety initiatives that rely on automated camera systems for monitoring and data collection. They argue that such technologies are essential tools for crime prevention, traffic management, and national security. The requirement to decommission existing systems within 180 days is viewed as an impractical and costly mandate that could disrupt ongoing operations and waste resources.
The analysis of H.R. 10221, sponsored by Thomas Massie, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This indicates that the financial interests of the donors do not appear to influence the legislation concerning the prohibition of Federal funds for covered camera systems. Given that there are no significant financial ties to the industries affected by this bill, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal. Voters should feel reassured that the legislative intent seems to be free from donor influence in this instance.
Top industries funding Thomas Massie, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
What does H.R. 10221 do?
The 'Flock-Off Act' (H.R. 10221) is a proposed law that aims to stop federal funds from being used to buy, install, or operate certain types of camera systems. These systems automatically capture and process images of vehicles, license plates, or individuals using technologies like machine learning or facial recognition. The bill requires federal agencies and recipients of federal funds to remove…
Has H.R. 10221 received a floor vote?
No roll-call vote on H.R. 10221 is recorded in our database yet. Its current status is “Introduced”.
Does H.R. 10221 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 10221 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Government Operations and Politics is 3.1/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of H.R. 10221?
H.R. 10221 is currently “Introduced” as of our last update on September 3, 2026.
Who sponsored H.R. 10221?
H.R. 10221 was sponsored by Thomas Massie (Republican).
