H.R. 10259

H.R. 10259: To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take certain actions before constructing a facility for purposes of detaining any person under the immigration laws, and for other purposes.

Introduced Veronica Escobar (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The DHS Community Consultation Act of 2026 requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to consult with local officials, community members, and public health authorities before building or leasing any facility intended for detaining individuals under immigration laws. The bill mandates public meetings, a 60-day comment period, and responses to community feedback. It prohibits construction in municipalities that have officially banned such facilities and sets health protocols for disease outbreaks. Additionally, it bars DHS from converting non-residential buildings into detention centers and from using military bases for detention purposes.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the DHS Community Consultation Act of 2026 commend the bill for promoting transparency and community involvement in decisions about immigration detention facilities. They highlight that the required consultations and public input processes empower local communities and ensure that their concerns are addressed. The bill's health protocols are seen as proactive measures to protect both detainees and the surrounding communities from potential disease outbreaks. Prohibiting the use of non-residential buildings and military installations for detention purposes is viewed as a step toward more humane and appropriate facilities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics argue that the DHS Community Consultation Act of 2026 could hinder the Department of Homeland Security's ability to respond swiftly to immigration enforcement needs. They contend that the extensive consultation and public comment requirements may lead to delays in constructing necessary detention facilities. Opponents also express concern that allowing municipalities to block construction through local ordinances could result in a patchwork of policies, complicating federal immigration enforcement efforts. Additionally, the restrictions on using existing non-residential structures and military bases are seen as limiting cost-effective options for detention facilities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$30,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

All donors are from Applied Materials, Inc., a technology company. There is no direct link between the company's business and the bill related to immigration detention facilities. The risk of conflict of interest is low.

Industry Overlap — Follow the Money

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Industry Match Type Related Subject Donations
Retired (W06) Sector Immigration $37,500,000
Total from overlapping industries $37,500,000
Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Veronica Escobar, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us