H.R. 10366

H.R. 10366: To amend title 23, United States Code, to withhold apportioned surface transportation funding from a State if such State fails to enact certain prohibitions relating to the use of automated license plate readers, and for other purposes.

Introduced Raja Krishnamoorthi (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 10366 aims to amend federal transportation funding regulations by allowing the federal government to withhold surface transportation funds from states that do not implement specific prohibitions on the use of automated license plate readers (ALPRs). This bill seeks to address privacy concerns associated with the use of ALPR technology by ensuring states take certain actions to regulate or limit their use.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 10366 have praised the bill for its focus on privacy and civil liberties, arguing that it empowers states to protect citizens from potential misuse of surveillance technologies. Advocates believe that the legislation could lead to a more balanced approach to law enforcement and technology, fostering public trust in government practices.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 10366 have expressed concern that the bill may impose undue federal control over state policies regarding law enforcement technology. Some argue that it could lead to a patchwork of regulations that complicate law enforcement efforts and hinder the effective use of technology in public safety. Others fear that the bill could be seen as an overreach of federal authority into state governance.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 10366, which addresses the use of automated license plate readers and conditions surface transportation funding, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the top donor industries of sponsor Raja Krishnamoorthi. This lack of overlap suggests that the bill is unlikely to be influenced by the financial interests of his donors. The absence of significant donor connections to the subject matter of the bill indicates that potential conflicts of interest are minimal. Voters should be aware that while campaign contributions can sometimes sway legislative priorities, in this case, the financial backing does not appear to intersect with the issues at hand.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us