H.R. 6460

H.R. 6460: Recreational Drone Empowerment Act

Passed House Tracey Mann (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Recreational Drone Empowerment Act (H.R. 6460) seeks to expand the areas where recreational drones can be flown. Currently, drones can operate in Class B, C, D, and G airspaces under certain conditions. This bill proposes allowing recreational drones to also fly in specific Class E airspaces, which are controlled airspaces above Class G or those that extend from other airspace classes, with FAA authorization.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Recreational Drone Empowerment Act have highlighted its potential to increase recreational drone usage and innovation. They argue that expanding the permitted airspace for recreational drones could lead to greater opportunities for hobbyists and boost the drone industry by reducing regulatory barriers.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill have raised concerns about safety and privacy, suggesting that expanding drone operations into more controlled airspaces could lead to increased risks of air traffic interference and potential invasions of privacy. Some media outlets have also pointed out that the bill may lead to regulatory challenges for the FAA in managing airspace effectively.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$67,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

There is a low risk of conflict of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries for the sponsor, Tracey Mann, are Retired, Securities & Investment, and Government, with donations amounting to $37,500,000, $15,000,000, and $15,000,000 respectively. There are no direct overlaps detected between these industries and the subject matter of the bill, H.R. 6460: Recreational Drone Empowerment Act. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not directly involve any of the sponsor's top donors. The highest lobbying activity comes from the National Stone Sand and Gravel Association with a total of $110,000. Therefore, based on the available data, there is no clear monetary trail that would suggest a conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL STONE SAND AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION NATIONAL STONE, SAND AND GRAVEL ASSOCIATION $110,000
APPALACHIAN NATURAL GAS OPERATORS COALITION LARRY PUCCIO, LLC $75,000
MAYNE PHARMA (USA), INC. AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD $70,000
STRATEGIC EDUCATION, INC. THE DUBERSTEIN GROUP INC. $60,000
JETZERO JETZERO $50,000
INTERACTIVE ADVERTISING BUREAU AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD $50,000
THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR AMATEUR RADIO DLA PIPER LLP (US) $40,000
ROCKET LAB USA INC. DLA PIPER LLP (US) $40,000
AMVETS/AMERICAN VETERANS AMVETS/AMERICAN VETERANS $30,000
ENDOCRINE SOCIETY CAVAROCCHI RUSCIO DENNIS ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. $30,000
NEW CASTLE COUNTY, DE SMITH GARSON $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
EXALT YOUTH PARK&K PUBLIC AFFAIRS LLC $6,000
HEARST TELEVISION INC BROOKS, PIERCE, MCLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, L.L.P. undisclosed
BASE OPERATIONS SIGNAL RIDGE STRATEGIES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Tracey Mann, ranked by total contributions.

Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0
Securities & Investment $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0
Government $15,000,000
Individuals: $15,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us