H.R. 8291

H.R. 8291: To establish a community disaster assistance fund for housing and community development and to authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to provide, from the fund, assistance through a community development block grant disaster

Introduced Al Green (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8291 proposes the creation of a community disaster assistance fund aimed at supporting housing and community development in the aftermath of disasters. The bill would authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to use this fund to provide assistance through community development block grants specifically designated for disaster recovery efforts.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage that supports H.R. 8291 highlights its potential to streamline and enhance disaster recovery efforts by providing targeted financial resources to affected communities. Proponents argue that the bill would ensure quicker and more efficient allocation of funds, helping communities rebuild and recover in a more timely manner.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8291 express concerns about the potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies and mismanagement of the disaster assistance fund. Some media outlets question whether the bill provides sufficient oversight and accountability measures to ensure that the funds are used effectively and reach the communities most in need.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Housing and Community Development

Based on the available data, there appears to be a low risk of conflicts of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. The sponsor, Al Green, does not have any direct overlaps between his top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, H.R. 8291, which pertains to housing and community development. However, there has been lobbying activity in this policy area. Notably, OSF Healthcare System has spent $60,000, Schwan's Company has spent $10,000, Covista has spent $40,000, and the Global Infrastructure Investor Association has spent $40,000. The other lobbying entities did not disclose their spending. It's important for voters to know that while these entities have lobbied in this policy area, there's no direct evidence to suggest that they have influenced this particular bill or its sponsor.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM $60,000
COVISTA FKA ADTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $40,000
NATIONAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $30,000
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION 56 CAPITALS LLC $20,000
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION $20,000
SABINE NECHES KENT CAPERTON CONSULTING $15,000
SCHWAN'S COMPANY PEARSON WILCOX ADVOCACY $10,000
CAPITOL COUNSEL, LLC ON BEHALF OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOR AMERICA MICHAEL R. PAWLOWSKI undisclosed
TRANSGAS KING STREET SOLUTIONS undisclosed
COUNTY OF MERCED HB STRATEGIES undisclosed
EXELIXIS, INC. W STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
BSYD CORPORATION RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
THE DIGITAL CHAMBER (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHAMBER OF DIGITAL COMMERCE) LIQUID ADVISORS, INC. undisclosed
COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION CASCADE PUBLIC AFFAIRS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Al Green, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us