H.R. 8454 is a bill that proposes to transfer control of certain federal lands between Yosemite National Park and Stanislaus National Forest in California. The change aims to allow cattle grazing on these lands to be managed by the Forest Service, which supports grazing as part of its multiple-use management approach.
H.R. 8454 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Tom McClintock (Republican) and is currently listed as “Passed House”. It is classified under the Public Lands and Natural Resources policy area, one of 158 bills in that area we track this Congress.
Tom McClintock is the sponsor of 7 bills in our database this Congress, so H.R. 8454 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
Senate lobbying disclosures list 15 organizations lobbying on this bill’s issue area.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 8454 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Public Lands and Natural Resources is 2/10.
Supporters of H.R. 8454 have praised the bill for promoting sustainable land management practices. They argue that transferring the land to the Forest Service will better align with the needs of local ranchers and enhance the management of grazing activities, contributing to both economic benefits and environmental stewardship.
Critics of H.R. 8454 have expressed concerns that the bill may undermine conservation efforts in Yosemite National Park. Some environmentalists argue that allowing grazing on these lands could lead to habitat degradation and negatively impact wildlife, raising alarms about the potential long-term consequences for the park's ecosystem.
The analysis of H.R. 8454 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Tom McClintock's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on the transfer of administrative jurisdiction over federal land in California. The top donor industries, primarily health professionals and retirees, do not have a clear connection to land management or federal land policies. The total contributions from these industries amount to $315 million, but they do not appear to influence the legislative intent of this bill. Additionally, the lobbying activity related to this bill does not indicate any significant financial interests that could create a conflict for the sponsor, as the amounts involved are relatively modest compared to his donor contributions. Therefore, the risk of conflict is assessed as low, as there are no apparent financial incentives that could sway the sponsor's legislative decisions regarding this bill.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| SAILDRONE INC. | SAILDRONE INC. | $410,042 |
| SAILDRONE INC. | SAILDRONE INC. | $377,725 |
| OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC | OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. | $158,589 |
| INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION | INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION | $150,000 |
| SBIR CONSORTIUM | JOHN WILLIAMS | $30,000 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND | BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS | $30,000 |
| SEEING MACHINES | GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC | $30,000 |
| SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE | GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC | $30,000 |
| CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. | DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC | $30,000 |
| MIDDLE EAST FORUM | MIDDLE EAST FORUM | $20,000 |
| ATA ACTION | RS GROUP CONSULTING LLC | $6,000 |
| END SEPSIS | CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC | undisclosed |
| TECHNEST SOLUTIONS S.L.A. DBA FORTRIS ON BEHALF OF NEXUSONE CONSULTING | CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC | undisclosed |
| SBCC EQUIPMENT | DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC | undisclosed |
| BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION | SUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding Tom McClintock, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
What does H.R. 8454 do?
H.R. 8454 is a bill that proposes to transfer control of certain federal lands between Yosemite National Park and Stanislaus National Forest in California. The change aims to allow cattle grazing on these lands to be managed by the Forest Service, which supports grazing as part of its multiple-use management approach.
Has H.R. 8454 received a floor vote?
No roll-call vote on H.R. 8454 is recorded in our database yet. Its current status is “Passed House”.
Does H.R. 8454 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 8454 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Public Lands and Natural Resources is 2/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of H.R. 8454?
H.R. 8454 is currently “Passed House” as of our last update on September 15, 2026.
Who sponsored H.R. 8454?
H.R. 8454 was sponsored by Tom McClintock (Republican).
