H.R. 8510

H.R. 8510: To require third-party delivery platforms to follow certain pricing practices, and for other purposes.

Introduced Dan Goldman (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8510 is a proposed bill that aims to regulate third-party delivery platforms by mandating specific pricing practices. This likely involves setting rules or limitations on how these platforms can charge fees to restaurants, customers, or both, potentially to ensure transparency and fairness in pricing structures.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8510 argue that the bill will protect small businesses and consumers from potentially exploitative pricing practices by third-party delivery platforms. By enforcing transparent pricing, the bill could help restaurants retain more of their revenue and ensure customers are not overcharged, fostering a more equitable marketplace.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8510 suggest that imposing pricing regulations on third-party delivery platforms could stifle innovation and competition. They argue that such regulations might lead to increased operational costs for delivery companies, which could be passed on to consumers, ultimately leading to higher prices or reduced service availability.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The bill H.R. 8510 is sponsored by Dan Goldman, a Democrat. The bill aims to regulate third-party delivery platforms' pricing practices. Upon analyzing the campaign finance data, no direct industry overlaps were detected between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This suggests a low risk of potential conflicts of interest. However, there has been lobbying activity in this bill's policy area. The organizations involved in lobbying include OSF Healthcare System, Capitol Counsel, LLC on behalf of Planned Parenthood for America, Schwan's Company, Covista, Global Infrastructure Investor Association, TransGas, County of Merced, Exelixis, Inc., and BSYD Corporation. The disclosed lobbying amounts total to $150,000. The undisclosed amounts, while unknown, also contribute to the overall financial influence in this policy area.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM $60,000
COVISTA FKA ADTALEM GLOBAL EDUCATION, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $40,000
NATIONAL SPECIAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $30,000
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION 56 CAPITALS LLC $20,000
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTOR ASSOCIATION $20,000
SABINE NECHES KENT CAPERTON CONSULTING $15,000
SCHWAN'S COMPANY PEARSON WILCOX ADVOCACY $10,000
CAPITOL COUNSEL, LLC ON BEHALF OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOR AMERICA MICHAEL R. PAWLOWSKI undisclosed
TRANSGAS KING STREET SOLUTIONS undisclosed
COUNTY OF MERCED HB STRATEGIES undisclosed
EXELIXIS, INC. W STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
BSYD CORPORATION RYBERG AND SMITH, L.L.C. undisclosed
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
THE DIGITAL CHAMBER (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHAMBER OF DIGITAL COMMERCE) LIQUID ADVISORS, INC. undisclosed
COASTAL CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION CASCADE PUBLIC AFFAIRS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Dan Goldman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us