H.R. 8542

H.R. 8542: To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide for the delegation of authority to Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama to manage certain expanded submerged lands, and f

Introduced Mike Ezell (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8542 is a bill that proposes amendments to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. It aims to delegate authority to the states of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama to manage certain expanded submerged lands. This likely involves granting these states more control over the management and regulation of natural resources, such as fisheries and potentially oil and gas activities, within their offshore areas.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8542 argue that delegating authority to Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama would allow for more localized and efficient management of natural resources. They believe that state governments have a better understanding of regional needs and can tailor regulations to benefit local economies, particularly in the fishing and energy sectors.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8542 express concerns that increased state control over submerged lands could lead to less stringent environmental protections. They worry that local interests might prioritize economic gains over environmental sustainability, potentially leading to overfishing or increased offshore drilling with inadequate oversight.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

Based on the available data, there appears to be a low risk of conflicts of interest between the sponsor's donors and the bill's subject matter. The sponsor, Mike Ezell, does not have any direct industry overlaps with the subject matter of the bill, which pertains to the management of certain expanded submerged lands. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this bill's policy area does not involve any of the sponsor's top donor industries. The largest lobbying expenditure in this policy area comes from Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners Inc., which spent $210,000. However, there is no evidence to suggest that this expenditure is directly related to the bill or the sponsor's donors. It is important for voters to be aware of these financial connections, but in this case, there does not appear to be a significant conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS $1,160,000
COPENHAGEN INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS INC. COPENHAGEN INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS INC. $210,000
SOLENO THERAPEUTICS, INC. SOLENO THERAPEUTICS, INC. $80,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER $80,000
THE AMHERST GROUP, LLC THE MAJORITY GROUP, LLC $60,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTURAL EDUCATORS $31,407
MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA WEST & WEST, LLC $24,300
STEELSHIPS, LLC CONSCIENCE POINT CONSULTING, INC. $20,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL $18,000
VIPO US CORUS FEDERAL STRATEGIES $10,000
DRONEUP JLF CONSULTING CO $10,000
BLACK KNIGHT MEDICAL, LLC JLF CONSULTING CO $7,500
NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION undisclosed
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS undisclosed
CAPITOL COUNSEL, LLC ON BEHALF OF BAYER CORPORATION MICHAEL R. PAWLOWSKI undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Ezell, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us