H.R. 8602

H.R. 8602: To repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act.

Introduced Eric Burlison (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8602 aims to repeal the wage requirements established by the Davis-Bacon Act, which mandates that contractors and subcontractors pay their laborers and mechanics prevailing wages on federally funded construction projects.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8602 argue that repealing the wage requirements could lead to cost savings for federal construction projects, potentially allowing for more infrastructure development and job creation. Proponents believe it could enhance competition among contractors, leading to lower bids and more efficient use of taxpayer dollars.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8602 contend that repealing the wage requirements could undermine labor standards, leading to lower wages for workers in the construction industry. Opponents worry that this bill could erode protections for laborers and result in a decline in the quality of work on federal projects, as it may incentivize contractors to cut costs at the expense of fair compensation.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The analysis of H.R. 8602, which seeks to repeal the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act, indicates a low risk of conflicts of interest based on the sponsor Eric Burlison's top donor industries. No direct overlaps were found between the bill's subject matter and the industries of Burlison's top donors. The lobbying activity related to this bill primarily involves organizations in the natural resources sector and other unrelated fields, with significant contributions from entities such as Parker Meggitt, who contributed $100,000. However, these contributions do not directly correlate with the wage requirements addressed in the bill. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal, as the financial interests of the donors do not align with the legislative intent of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA LLC JOHN MCENTEE $225,000
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION $180,000
PARKER MEGGITT PARKER MEGGITT $100,000
GUIDESTAR ELDERCARE LOPER CONSULTING LLC $40,000
GERSHOW RECYCLING CORPORATION BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
PACE UNIVERSITY BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
NATURA RESOURCES BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
TOSHIBA CORPORATION BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $18,000
AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
NATIONAL RETIREE LEGISLATIVE NETWORK ALYSON PARKER $15,000
TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $10,000
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TWO RIVERS LLC $6,000
JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION CARTER LAWS & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Eric Burlison, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us