H.R. 8640

H.R. 8640: To direct the Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to establish and maintain a database for commercial driver’s license data, and for other purposes.

Introduced David Taylor (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8640 aims to create and manage a database specifically for commercial driver's license (CDL) data, overseen by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). This database is intended to enhance the tracking and management of CDL information, which may include details about licensing, driving records, and any violations or disqualifications.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8640 highlight that the establishment of a comprehensive CDL database will improve road safety by ensuring that only qualified drivers are on the road. They argue that better data management can help reduce accidents and enhance the enforcement of driving regulations, ultimately benefiting the trucking industry and public safety.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8640 express concerns about potential privacy issues related to the collection and storage of personal information in the CDL database. Additionally, some argue that the bill may impose unnecessary bureaucratic burdens on states and the FMCSA, diverting resources away from other critical safety initiatives.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 8640, sponsored by David Taylor, indicates no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill focuses on establishing a database for commercial driver's license data, which does not align with the interests of the major donor industries associated with Taylor. The lobbying activity in this policy area primarily involves organizations related to natural resources and education, which do not present a direct conflict with the bill's objectives. The total lobbying amounts from these entities are significant, with contributions such as $100,000 from Parker Meggitt and $30,000 from Gershow Recycling Corporation, but they do not influence the specific legislative intent of the bill. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA LLC JOHN MCENTEE $225,000
AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION AMERICAN COUNSELING ASSOCIATION $180,000
PARKER MEGGITT PARKER MEGGITT $100,000
GUIDESTAR ELDERCARE LOPER CONSULTING LLC $40,000
GERSHOW RECYCLING CORPORATION BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
PACE UNIVERSITY BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $30,000
NATURA RESOURCES BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $20,000
TOSHIBA CORPORATION BLUEWATER STRATEGIES $18,000
AUTISM SCIENCE FOUNDATION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION IKON PUBLIC AFFAIRS $18,000
NATIONAL RETIREE LEGISLATIVE NETWORK ALYSON PARKER $15,000
TOWN OF CLARKSTOWN BROWN & WEINRAUB ADVISORS, LLC $10,000
CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI TWO RIVERS LLC $6,000
JOHN HOPE FRANKLIN CENTER FOR RECONCILIATION CARTER LAWS & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding David Taylor, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us