H.R. 8680

H.R. 8680: To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 to establish a rebuttable presumption in favor of authorizing a member of the Armed Forces to carry a personal firearm on a military installation.

Introduced Jeff Crank (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8680 proposes to amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016 by establishing a rebuttable presumption that members of the Armed Forces can carry personal firearms on military installations. This means that service members would generally be allowed to carry their own guns while on base unless there are specific reasons to prohibit it.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8680 argue that allowing service members to carry personal firearms enhances their personal safety and security, especially in light of rising concerns about violence on military installations. Proponents suggest that this bill empowers military personnel and acknowledges their rights to self-defense.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8680 express concerns that allowing more firearms on military installations could lead to increased risks of accidents and incidents of gun violence. Opponents argue that the presence of more personal firearms may complicate security protocols and could undermine the safety of both military personnel and civilians on bases.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The risk of conflict of interest for this bill appears to be low. The sponsor, Jeff Crank, does not have any direct overlaps between his top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which pertains to the authorization of carrying personal firearms on military installations. However, there is lobbying activity in this bill's policy area from various entities. Notably, NSIGHT HEALTH, INC., a donor to the sponsor, has undisclosed lobbying activity. While this does not directly suggest a conflict of interest, it does warrant some attention. Other entities, such as the AMERICAN COMPOSITES MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL ENERGY & FUELS INSTITUTE, have disclosed lobbying amounts of $20,000 and $60,000 respectively, but these do not appear to be directly related to the bill's subject matter or the sponsor's donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area. 1 lobbying client(s) are also sponsor donors.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NSIGHT HEALTH, INC. Also a Donor MONTICELLO ADVISORY GROUP undisclosed
NATIONAL ENERGY & FUELS INSTITUTE NATIONAL ENERGY & FUELS INSTITUTE $60,000
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC $21,000
AMERICAN COMPOSITES MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION AMERICAN COMPOSITES MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION $20,000
LEONARDO DRS, INC HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC $15,000
HOPFLYT INC HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
SL STRATEGIES OBO AANA HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
CLEARINGHOUSE CDFI MONTICELLO ADVISORY GROUP undisclosed
WING AVIATION LLC WING AVIATION LLC undisclosed
ROBERT TRENT JONES II LLC PLATINUM ADVISORS DC, LLC undisclosed
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF GOLF COURSE ARCHITECTS PLATINUM ADVISORS DC, LLC undisclosed
ALLIANCE OF PROFESSIONALS & CONSULTANTS ON BEHALF OF IBM CORP PLATINUM ADVISORS DC, LLC undisclosed
SAVE GREATER DOWSES BEACH HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
GDX CORPORATION HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
TOWN OF NANTUCKET, MA HITHER CREEK STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jeff Crank, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us