H.R. 8692

H.R. 8692: To amend title 49, United States Code, to allow certain grant funds issued by the Secretary of Transportation to be used for the deployment and purchasing of technology for certain autonomous shared mobility vehicles, and for other purposes.

Introduced Kevin Kiley (I) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8692 aims to amend federal transportation law to enable the use of grant funds from the Secretary of Transportation for the deployment and purchase of technology related to certain autonomous shared mobility vehicles. This legislation is intended to support the development and integration of autonomous vehicles that can be shared among users, potentially enhancing public transportation options.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8692 argue that the bill represents a significant step towards modernizing transportation infrastructure and promoting innovation in mobility solutions. Positive coverage highlights the potential benefits of autonomous shared vehicles, including reduced traffic congestion, lower emissions, and improved accessibility for underserved communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8692 express concerns regarding safety and regulatory oversight for autonomous vehicles. Negative media coverage often focuses on the potential risks associated with deploying unproven technology on public roads, as well as the implications for jobs in the transportation sector. Some opponents also argue that the bill may prioritize technology over necessary infrastructure improvements.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$420,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The bill H.R. 8692 aims to amend transportation funding to support technology for autonomous shared mobility vehicles. The top donor industries for sponsor Kevin Kiley are health professionals and retirees, with no direct overlap with the transportation or technology sectors relevant to this bill. This lack of direct industry connection suggests a lower risk of conflicts of interest. However, there is some lobbying activity in the policy area, particularly from USIG Digital, which has also contributed to Kiley's campaign. The total amount from USIG Digital is $30,000, indicating a potential interest in the bill's outcomes but not a clear conflict given the absence of direct industry ties to Kiley's top donors. Voters should be aware that while there are some lobbying influences, the primary donor industries do not align with the bill's subject matter, mitigating concerns about conflicts.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area. 2 lobbying client(s) are also sponsor donors.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
USIG DIGITAL Also a Donor SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
USIG DIGITAL Also a Donor SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
THE GEO GROUP, INC. CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $80,000
COPPER.CO SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $36,000
AMPL-ACTION FUND (FORMERLY ADVOCATES FOR MULTI-USE OF PUBLIC LANDS) BIGHORN PUBLIC AFFAIRS GROUP $20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
PVS CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ARTPARK MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
MHG TELCO, LLL MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
ROSINA FOODS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $9,000
THE SALVATION ARMY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $6,000
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
THE GUTHRIE CLINIC BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Kevin Kiley, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $320,000,000
Individuals: $320,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $100,000,000
Individuals: $100,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us