H.R. 8710

H.R. 8710: To amend title 10, United States Code, to require the Secretary of Defense to implement resilient capabilities to recover critical Department of Defense data in the event such data is lost, degraded, or destroyed, and for other purposes.

Introduced Suhas Subramanyam (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8710 is a bill that aims to amend U.S. law to require the Secretary of Defense to establish robust systems and procedures for recovering important Department of Defense data if it is lost, damaged, or destroyed. This legislation emphasizes the importance of data resilience and security within the Department.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8710 have praised the bill for addressing critical vulnerabilities in national defense infrastructure. They argue that enhancing data recovery capabilities is essential for maintaining operational integrity and ensuring national security in the face of cyber threats and other risks.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8710 have raised concerns about the potential costs associated with implementing these data recovery systems. Some argue that the bill may divert resources from other important defense initiatives and question whether the proposed measures are sufficient to address the complexities of data management in the Department of Defense.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
1/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$105,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The bill H.R. 8710, sponsored by Suhas Subramanyam, is aimed at enhancing the resilience of the Department of Defense's data recovery capabilities. The sponsor's top donor industries are Health Professionals and Retired individuals, with no direct overlap detected between these industries and the subject matter of the bill. This suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest based on the sponsor's campaign finance data. However, there has been significant lobbying activity in the bill's policy area, with various entities such as Hogan Lovells, LLP and Radiance Technologies, Inc. spending considerable amounts on lobbying. It's important to note that these lobbying activities do not directly implicate the sponsor, but they do indicate a broader industry interest in the bill's policy area.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION $2,280,000
HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. MO STRATEGIES, INC. $350,000
RADIANCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VENN STRATEGIES $60,000
MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE US, LLC MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE US, LLC $30,000
CLARK STREET ASSOCIATES ON BEHALF OF MARVELL TECHNOLOGY, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $30,000
NANO NUCLEAR ENERGY INC COVE STRATEGIES $20,000
CITY OF KOTZEBUE, ALASKA HOLLAND & HART LLP $10,000
SPACE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE, INC. SPACE GOVERNANCE INSTITUTE, INC. undisclosed
MCKEES ROCKS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CRANMER CONSULTANTS undisclosed
LYTEN, INC. JHS CONSULTING, INC undisclosed
SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY undisclosed
PRESERVATION ACTION PRESERVATION ACTION undisclosed
GOLD PR LTD. (ON BEHALF OF OJSC "BAKAI BANK") THROUGHLINE GLOBAL ADVISORS undisclosed
WORKIVA INC. LSN PARTNERS, LLC undisclosed
IMMIGRATION EQUALITY IMMIGRATION EQUALITY undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Suhas Subramanyam, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us