H.R. 8788

H.R. 8788: To prohibit vulture investors from investing in youth sports, and for other purposes.

Introduced Chris Deluzio (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8788 aims to prevent vulture investors, who typically seek to profit from distressed assets, from investing in youth sports programs. The bill is likely designed to protect the integrity and accessibility of youth sports by ensuring that funding and support come from sources that prioritize the well-being of young athletes rather than profit-driven motives.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8788 have praised the bill for its commitment to safeguarding youth sports from exploitative financial practices. Many believe that it will help maintain a focus on the development and enjoyment of young athletes, ensuring that sports programs remain community-oriented and accessible to all children.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8788 argue that the bill may limit necessary funding for youth sports by excluding potential investors who could provide financial support. Some commentators express concern that the prohibition on vulture investors could inadvertently hinder the growth and improvement of youth sports programs, which often rely on diverse funding sources.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$105,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 8788, which aims to prohibit vulture investors from investing in youth sports, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Chris Deluzio's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. Deluzio's top donors include Health Professionals and Retired individuals, contributing significant amounts of $80 million and $25 million respectively. These industries do not have a direct interest in youth sports or vulture investing, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this policy area does not suggest any substantial financial influence from entities that would be directly affected by this legislation, further supporting the low risk assessment.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
THE GEO GROUP, INC. CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $80,000
COPPER.CO SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $36,000
AMPL-ACTION FUND (FORMERLY ADVOCATES FOR MULTI-USE OF PUBLIC LANDS) BIGHORN PUBLIC AFFAIRS GROUP $20,000
USIG DIGITAL SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
USIG DIGITAL SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
PVS CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ARTPARK MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
MHG TELCO, LLL MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
ROSINA FOODS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $9,000
THE SALVATION ARMY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $6,000
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
THE GUTHRIE CLINIC BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Chris Deluzio, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us