H.R. 8799

H.R. 8799: To establish certain requirements for any communications by a private entity regarding United States Department of Transportation numbers, and for other purposes.

Introduced Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8799 aims to set specific requirements for how private entities communicate information related to United States Department of Transportation (DOT) numbers. This could involve regulations on the accuracy, clarity, and accessibility of the information shared by these private entities regarding DOT numbers, which are used to identify and track commercial vehicles and their operators.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 8799 for promoting transparency and accountability in the transportation sector. They argue that clear communication requirements will help prevent misinformation and ensure that stakeholders have access to accurate DOT-related information, ultimately enhancing safety and regulatory compliance.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8799 have raised concerns about potential overregulation and the burden it may place on private entities. Some media reports suggest that the bill could lead to increased compliance costs and hinder business operations, particularly for smaller companies that may struggle to meet the new requirements.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 8799 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, and her top donor industries, indicating a low potential for conflicts of interest. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes contributions from various entities, such as The GEO Group, Inc. ($80,000) and A.C.E. Consulting, which has undisclosed amounts. However, these contributions do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on communications regarding Department of Transportation numbers. The absence of overlapping donor industries suggests that the financial interests of the sponsors' donors are not aligned with the subject matter of the bill, reducing the likelihood of conflicts. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists in the policy area, the lack of direct financial ties to the bill's content mitigates potential concerns.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
THE GEO GROUP, INC. CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $80,000
COPPER.CO SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $36,000
AMPL-ACTION FUND (FORMERLY ADVOCATES FOR MULTI-USE OF PUBLIC LANDS) BIGHORN PUBLIC AFFAIRS GROUP $20,000
USIG DIGITAL SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
USIG DIGITAL SOBBA PUBLIC, LLC $15,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
PVS CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ARTPARK MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
MHG TELCO, LLL MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $10,500
ROSINA FOODS MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $9,000
THE SALVATION ARMY MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $6,000
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
A.C.E. CONSULTING A.C.E. CONSULTING DBA A.C.E. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING undisclosed
THE GUTHRIE CLINIC BUCHANAN INGERSOLL & ROONEY PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us