H.R. 8806

H.R. 8806: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish the newborn tax credit and for other purposes.

Introduced David Valadao (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8806 aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code to introduce a new tax credit specifically for newborns. This credit would likely provide financial support to families with new children, potentially alleviating some of the economic burdens associated with childbirth and early child-rearing expenses.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8806 have praised the newborn tax credit as a necessary step to support families in the U.S. They argue that this financial assistance will help alleviate the costs of raising children and promote family stability, which could have positive long-term effects on society.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8806 express concerns about the potential financial impact on government budgets and question the sustainability of introducing new tax credits. Some argue that the bill may disproportionately benefit wealthier families who may not need the additional support, while others believe it could complicate the tax system further.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 8806, which aims to establish a newborn tax credit, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor David Valadao's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. This suggests that there are minimal immediate financial incentives for the sponsor that could lead to conflicts of interest regarding the bill. However, there is significant lobbying activity in the policy area, with the National Electrical Contractors Association, Inc. contributing $600,000. While this amount is substantial, it does not directly relate to the newborn tax credit, indicating that the lobbying efforts may not be aimed at influencing this specific legislation. Voters should be aware that while there are no direct conflicts, the presence of lobbying could still indicate broader interests at play.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. $600,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
ENVISION GROUP LLC MR. ANDREW FUTEY undisclosed
GESCONTI GROUP,INC. GESCONTI GROUP,INC. undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN LOGISTICS ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
TRACKONOMY SYSTEMS, INC. ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
HOLLY STRATEGIES INC. ON BEHALF OF 202 GROUP ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ST LOUIS BRACY TUCKER BROWN & VALANZANO DBA BROWN & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
EMAD EL SAID YOUSSEF SAAD EL-GALADA THROUGH BOLT CAPITAL, LP NEXUSONE CONSULTING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding David Valadao, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $280,000,000
Individuals: $280,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $87,500,000
Individuals: $87,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us