H.R. 8811

H.R. 8811: To address maternal mental health conditions and substance use disorders, and for other purposes.

Introduced Yvette Clarke (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8811 aims to improve the treatment and support for maternal mental health conditions and substance use disorders among pregnant and postpartum women. The bill likely includes provisions for increasing access to mental health services, promoting awareness of these issues, and potentially providing funding for programs that assist mothers facing these challenges.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised H.R. 8811 for its focus on an often-overlooked aspect of maternal health. Advocates highlight the importance of addressing mental health and substance use disorders as critical components of comprehensive maternal care, which can lead to better outcomes for mothers and their children.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics argue that H.R. 8811 may not go far enough in addressing the systemic issues surrounding maternal mental health and substance use. Concerns have been raised about the adequacy of funding and resources allocated to truly make a difference, with calls for more robust measures to support vulnerable populations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 8811, which focuses on maternal mental health conditions and substance use disorders, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Yvette Clarke's top donor industries. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes a variety of organizations, such as the National Association for Family Child Care and Zero to Three, which are focused on family and child welfare. However, these organizations do not have a direct financial interest that conflicts with the objectives of the bill. The total lobbying amounts from these groups, while significant, do not indicate a direct financial influence that could skew legislative intent. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest remains low, as there are no substantial ties between the financial contributors and the bill's focus areas.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ZERO TO THREE ACTUM I, LLC $60,000
SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $34,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS $30,000
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION RICH FEUER ANDERSON $30,000
EARLY EDGE CALIFORNIA ACTUM I, LLC $20,000
POWERUS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $17,500
ALABAMA FAMILIES FOR GREAT SCHOOLS BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILY CHILD CARE ACTUM I, LLC $10,000
MID-TIER ADVOCACY WASHINGTON PREMIER GROUP undisclosed
SPECIALTY MATERIALS, INC STRATEGIC MARKETING INNOVATIONS undisclosed
SENECA NATION SPIRIT ROCK CONSULTING undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS undisclosed
ALLIANCE FOR MEDICARE THE PICARD GROUP, LLC undisclosed
GULF PORTS ASSN PAT YOUNGER undisclosed
FUTURE DEFENSE USA, INC. DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Yvette Clarke, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us