H.R. 8865

H.R. 8865: To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to exclude providers convicted of certain fraud-related criminal offenses from participation in Federal health care programs on a permanent basis.

Introduced Pete Stauber (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8865 proposes to amend the Social Security Act to permanently exclude health care providers who have been convicted of specific fraud-related crimes from participating in federal health care programs. This means that if a provider is found guilty of certain types of fraud, they would be banned from receiving federal funds for their services indefinitely.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 8865 argue that the bill strengthens the integrity of federal health care programs by ensuring that those who commit fraud cannot exploit the system. They believe this will protect taxpayer dollars and improve the quality of care for patients by maintaining high standards for health care providers.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 8865 express concern that the bill may be overly punitive, potentially banning providers for life without considering the context of their convictions or the possibility of rehabilitation. They argue that this could exacerbate shortages of health care providers in certain areas, particularly in underserved communities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 8865, sponsored by Pete Stauber, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill aims to exclude providers convicted of fraud-related offenses from federal health care programs, which does not appear to directly benefit any specific donor industries. However, there is notable lobbying activity in the health care sector, with significant contributions from entities such as Verdego Aero ($200,000) and Anello Photonics ($30,000), which may have indirect interests in health care reform. Despite this, the lack of direct connections suggests a lower risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware of the lobbying influence in health care but can feel reassured that the sponsor's financial backers do not have a direct stake in the bill's provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
REFORMING AMERICA'S TAXES EQUITABLY (RATE) SURROUND SOUND STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC undisclosed
ADNEURIS THERAPEUTICS, INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
ALUCHEM INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
GPA MIDSTREAM ASSOCIATION SHUMAKER ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed
INDUSTRIOUS GROUP INC. THORN RUN PARTNERS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Pete Stauber, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us