H.R. 8989

H.R. 8989: To amend the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to carry out demonstration programs to develop, implement, and evaluate evidence-based strategies to prevent suicide among children and adolescents, an

Introduced Brittany Pettersen (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 8989 aims to amend the Public Health Service Act to empower the Secretary of Health and Human Services to create demonstration programs focused on developing, implementing, and evaluating effective strategies to prevent suicide among children and adolescents.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised H.R. 8989 for its proactive approach to addressing the urgent issue of youth suicide, highlighting the importance of evidence-based strategies in improving mental health outcomes for children and adolescents. Advocates for mental health reform view this bill as a critical step toward reducing suicide rates in this vulnerable population.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics have raised concerns about the potential for bureaucratic inefficiencies in the implementation of the demonstration programs outlined in H.R. 8989. Additionally, there are worries that the bill may not allocate sufficient funding or resources to effectively support these initiatives, which could undermine its intended impact on preventing youth suicide.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
7/10
Risk Level
High
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The bill H.R. 8989, aimed at preventing suicide among children and adolescents, is sponsored by Brittany Pettersen, who has received significant donations from the health professionals sector, totaling $120 million. This creates a potential conflict of interest as the bill directly pertains to health-related issues, and the substantial financial backing from health professionals could influence the bill's direction and implementation. Additionally, the retired sector, contributing $37.5 million, may also have indirect interests in health policies affecting older demographics, which could overlap with child and adolescent health initiatives. Voters should be aware that while the intentions behind the bill are commendable, the financial ties could lead to prioritization of certain health strategies that benefit sponsors over the best interests of the targeted demographic.

Industry Overlap — Follow the Money

These industries are both affected by this bill and among the sponsor's top donors.

Industry Match Type Related Subject Donations
Health Professionals (H01) Sector Health $120,000,000
Total from overlapping industries $120,000,000
Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERDEGO AERO THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $200,000
PELION VENTURE PARTNERS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $38,000
REFORMING AMERICA'S TAXES EQUITABLY (RATE) SURROUND SOUND STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
ANELLO PHOTONICS THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $30,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
47G THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $15,000
GRAIN CHAIN THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC $5,000
SKYFRONT THE JACKSON GROUP, LLC undisclosed
ADNEURIS THERAPEUTICS, INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
ALUCHEM INC. MAD GLOBAL STRATEGY undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
GPA MIDSTREAM ASSOCIATION SHUMAKER ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed
INDUSTRIOUS GROUP INC. THORN RUN PARTNERS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brittany Pettersen, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us