H.R. 9031

H.R. 9031: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to establish a refundable young adult tax credit with monthly advance payment.

Introduced Morgan McGarvey (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9031 proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code to create a refundable tax credit specifically for young adults. This credit would be available to eligible individuals and would be paid out in monthly advance payments, providing financial support on a regular basis rather than as a lump sum at tax time.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9031 have praised the bill for its potential to alleviate financial burdens on young adults, particularly in the wake of rising living costs and student debt. Media coverage has highlighted the benefits of providing consistent monthly payments, which could help young individuals manage their budgets more effectively and promote economic stability.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9031 argue that establishing a new tax credit could complicate the tax system and lead to increased government spending. Some media outlets have voiced concerns about the long-term fiscal implications of the bill, suggesting that it may not be sustainable or could divert funds from other essential programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9031, which aims to establish a refundable young adult tax credit, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Morgan McGarvey's top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes various organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial interest in the tax credit itself. The largest lobbying contributions come from organizations such as Zero to Three ($60,000) and the National Association of State Aviation Officials ($30,000), which do not have a clear connection to the bill's focus on young adult tax credits. This lack of direct financial ties indicates a low risk of conflict of interest for voters to be concerned about.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ZERO TO THREE ACTUM I, LLC $60,000
SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION SECURITY INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $34,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE AVIATION OFFICIALS $30,000
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION RICH FEUER ANDERSON $30,000
EARLY EDGE CALIFORNIA ACTUM I, LLC $20,000
POWERUS SAUNDERS GLOBAL DIPLOMACY $17,500
ALABAMA FAMILIES FOR GREAT SCHOOLS BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP $10,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILY CHILD CARE ACTUM I, LLC $10,000
MID-TIER ADVOCACY WASHINGTON PREMIER GROUP undisclosed
SPECIALTY MATERIALS, INC STRATEGIC MARKETING INNOVATIONS undisclosed
SENECA NATION SPIRIT ROCK CONSULTING undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS undisclosed
ALLIANCE FOR MEDICARE THE PICARD GROUP, LLC undisclosed
GULF PORTS ASSN PAT YOUNGER undisclosed
FUTURE DEFENSE USA, INC. DENNIS CARDOZA CONSULTING SERVICES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Morgan McGarvey, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us