H.R. 9053

H.R. 9053: To ensure the reliable delivery of water to the United States under the 1944 Water Treaty, to provide a mechanism to compensate United States agricultural producers for economic losses resulting from delivery shortfalls, and for other purposes

Introduced Mónica De La Cruz (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9053 aims to ensure that the United States receives a consistent and reliable supply of water as outlined in the 1944 Water Treaty. Additionally, the bill proposes a system to compensate American farmers for any economic losses they may incur if there are shortages in water delivery.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9053 have praised the bill for addressing critical water delivery issues and providing necessary compensation to farmers, which they argue will help stabilize agricultural production and support rural economies. The bill is seen as a proactive measure to safeguard water resources and ensure compliance with international agreements.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9053 have raised concerns about the potential financial burden on taxpayers due to the compensation mechanism for farmers. Some argue that the bill may not adequately address the root causes of water delivery shortfalls and could lead to further dependency on government assistance rather than promoting sustainable water management practices.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of H.R. 9053 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Mónica De La Cruz's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on water delivery and compensation for agricultural producers. The lobbying activity associated with the bill includes various organizations, but none appear to directly relate to the agricultural sector or water management, which are the primary concerns of the legislation. The highest lobbying amounts come from Hart Health Strategies ($40,000) and the Alliance for Automotive Innovation ($30,000), neither of which has a clear connection to water delivery or agricultural compensation. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, as the financial interests represented do not intersect with the bill's objectives.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ENVIRI ENVIRI $140,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (FKA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION) BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA (FKA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION) $30,000
FM LABS EQV STRATEGIC $15,000
BIG SKY SCIENTIFIC EQV STRATEGIC $15,000
CUBE RECOVERY COMPANY (DBA TEMPIQ) PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
THESEUS TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
QUANTIFIND PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS INC. PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
WINGXPAND PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP $10,000
ANITOX EQV STRATEGIC $7,500
PROJECT LEGACY THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP undisclosed
THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP THE FRIEDLANDER GROUP undisclosed
THE PROJECT HONG KONG TRUST THE PROJECT HONG KONG TRUST undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mónica De La Cruz, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $600,000,000
Individuals: $600,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $187,500,000
Individuals: $187,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us