H.R. 9065

H.R. 9065: To provide research on, and services for, individuals with clinical mental health complications following a pregnancy loss, and for other purposes.

Introduced Addison McDowell (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9065 aims to support individuals who experience mental health issues after a pregnancy loss by funding research and providing necessary services. The bill seeks to address the psychological impact of such losses and improve mental health care for affected individuals.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised H.R. 9065 for its focus on mental health support following pregnancy loss, highlighting the importance of addressing the emotional well-being of individuals during a challenging time. Advocates have welcomed the bill as a step towards recognizing and validating the experiences of those affected by pregnancy loss.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics argue that H.R. 9065 may not adequately address the broader systemic issues surrounding mental health care access and funding. There are concerns that the bill could be seen as a limited approach to a complex problem, potentially overshadowing the need for comprehensive mental health reform.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9065, which focuses on providing research and services for individuals with clinical mental health complications following pregnancy loss, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Addison McDowell's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in mental health services or pregnancy-related issues. While there is lobbying activity from various organizations, such as VIASAT, INC. and SOUTHWEST AIRLINES, the amounts contributed ($20,000 each) do not indicate a clear conflict with the bill's intent. Furthermore, the undisclosed amounts from other entities do not provide enough information to suggest a significant risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the lack of direct financial ties to the bill's subject matter suggests a low risk of conflicts.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
REFORM ACTION FUND THE TOLMAN GROUP $30,000
VIASAT, INC. GORMAN STRATEGY GROUP, TOO $20,000
PHOTONIS LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC $20,000
SOUTHWEST AIRLINES THE MONDELLO GROUP LLC $20,000
HUBBARD BROADCASTING STEPHEN WARD CONSULTING, LLC $20,000
ISTATION THE MONDELLO GROUP LLC undisclosed
LUMA ENERGY, LLC TRUE COMPASS, LLC undisclosed
SANTA FE FARMS, INC DBA ELEMENT6 DYNAMICS STEPHEN WARD CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
LOUISIANA ENERGY SERVICES, LLC STEPHEN WARD CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NUCOR CORPORATION MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NEXUS HOSPICE OF THE HIGH DESERT LLC MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
TWG CADILLAC FORMULA 1 TEAM HOLDINGS, LLC MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
COSTAR GROUP, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
PADSPLIT, INC. CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Addison McDowell, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us