H.R. 9102 is a bipartisan bill introduced on June 2, 2026, by Representatives John Moolenaar (R-MI) and Debbie Dingell (D-MI). The bill aims to amend Title VIII of the Defense Production Act of 1950 by modifying the definitions of 'prohibited technology' and 'notifiable technology.' These changes are intended to update and clarify the categories of technologies that are either restricted or require notification under the Act, reflecting advancements and shifts in the technological landscape.
While specific media coverage on H.R. 9102 is limited, the bill's bipartisan sponsorship suggests a collaborative effort to address national security concerns related to emerging technologies. Supporters are likely to view the bill as a necessary step to modernize the Defense Production Act, ensuring that the United States remains vigilant and proactive in identifying and regulating technologies that could impact national security.
Critics may express concerns that the bill could lead to overregulation, potentially stifling innovation and placing undue burdens on technology companies. There might also be apprehension about the government's expanded role in defining and controlling technological development, raising questions about the balance between national security and economic growth.
The analysis of H.R. 9102, sponsored by John Moolenaar, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This indicates a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from financial contributions influencing the legislative process. Moolenaar's top donors are not directly involved in sectors that would benefit from alterations to the definitions of 'prohibited technology' and 'notifiable technology' under the Defense Production Act. As a result, the potential for undue influence appears minimal, and voters can be reassured that the bill's intent is not swayed by donor interests. However, continued vigilance is necessary as campaign finance dynamics can shift over time.
Top industries funding John Moolenaar, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
