H.R. 9115

H.R. 9115: To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.

Introduced Clay Higgins (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9115 seeks to amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 by extending the authorities outlined in Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978. This likely involves provisions related to surveillance and intelligence gathering on foreign entities and individuals, aiming to enhance national security measures.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9115 argue that extending these surveillance authorities is crucial for maintaining national security and protecting the United States from foreign threats. They highlight that the bill provides necessary tools for intelligence agencies to effectively monitor and respond to potential risks.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9115 express concerns about the potential for abuse of surveillance powers and the erosion of civil liberties. They argue that extending these authorities without adequate oversight could lead to violations of privacy rights and unjustified monitoring of individuals.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9115 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Clay Higgins' top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which focuses on extending authorities related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. While there is lobbying activity from various entities in the policy area, the lack of direct financial ties between the sponsor's donors and the bill's provisions suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. The undisclosed nature of the lobbying activities makes it challenging to ascertain the specific motivations behind these efforts, but without clear connections to the sponsor's financial backers, the risk remains minimal. Voters should remain vigilant about potential influences but can be reassured that, based on the available data, there are no immediate red flags.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RYAN, LLC MILLER & CHEVALIER CHARTERED undisclosed
TITAN DYNAMICS REVERE FEDERAL STRATEGIES undisclosed
WATCHTOWER LABS REVERE FEDERAL STRATEGIES undisclosed
DISTRIBUTED SPECTRUM REVERE FEDERAL STRATEGIES undisclosed
WINGTRA AG GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
STANDARD BOTS INC. REVERE FEDERAL STRATEGIES undisclosed
TRANSDIGM GROUP, INC. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
SYSTEMS PLANNING & ANALYSIS, LLC GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
STRONGBOX COMMERCIAL, LLC GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
STRIDE, INC. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
SPEKTREWORKS, INC. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
QUANTUM CORRIDOR LLC GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
PACIFIC FUSION CORPORATION GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
LONG WALL COMPANY GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed
KRATOS DEFENSE AND SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Clay Higgins, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us