H.R. 9123

H.R. 9123: To establish intelligence community funding restrictions on institutions of higher education that have a relationship with certain entities in the People’s Republic of China, and for other purposes.

Introduced Patrick Fallon (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9123 seeks to impose funding restrictions on higher education institutions in the United States that have partnerships or relationships with specific entities in China. The bill aims to ensure that U.S. intelligence community funding does not support institutions that may be linked to potential security threats from the People's Republic of China.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9123 argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect national security and prevent sensitive information from falling into the hands of foreign adversaries. Proponents highlight the importance of safeguarding U.S. research and education from foreign influence, especially in the context of rising tensions with China.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9123 express concerns that the bill could hinder academic collaboration and research opportunities with international partners. They argue that it may lead to unnecessary restrictions on educational institutions and could stifle innovation and diversity in research by isolating U.S. higher education from global networks.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

The analysis of H.R. 9123, sponsored by Patrick Fallon, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. Fallon's primary financial support comes from the Health Professionals sector, contributing a substantial $120 million, and the Retired sector, contributing $37.5 million. However, these industries do not have a direct connection to the bill's focus on intelligence community funding restrictions related to higher education institutions and their affiliations with entities in the People's Republic of China. As such, there appears to be minimal risk of conflicts of interest stemming from Fallon's financial backers in relation to this specific legislation. Voters should be aware that while large contributions can raise questions about influence, in this case, the lack of overlap suggests that the motivations behind the bill may not be financially driven by donor interests.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Patrick Fallon, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us