H.R. 9128

H.R. 9128: To amend the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936 for the protection of certain information, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mark Messmer (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9128 aims to amend the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936 to enhance the protection of certain types of information related to commodity trading and exchanges. This could involve measures to safeguard sensitive data from unauthorized disclosure and potentially improve the integrity and security of the commodities market.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 9128 for its proactive approach to protecting sensitive information in the commodities market, highlighting that it could lead to increased investor confidence and stability within the trading environment. Supporters argue that stronger protections are necessary to prevent data breaches and maintain fair trading practices.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9128 have raised concerns about the potential for overreach in information protection, arguing that it could stifle transparency and limit access to important market data. Some analysts fear that excessive regulation might hinder competition and innovation in the commodities sector, leading to negative repercussions for smaller traders and businesses.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9128, sponsored by Mark Messmer, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The primary donor industries are Health Professionals, contributing $120 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $37.5 million. Given that the bill focuses on amending the Commodity Exchange Act, which primarily deals with financial markets and trading regulations, there is a lack of relevant connections to the sponsor's major donor industries. The lobbying activity in the policy area does not indicate any significant financial interests that would create a conflict of interest for the sponsor. Therefore, the risk of conflicts arising from this bill is assessed as low, as there are no evident financial incentives that could sway the sponsor's legislative actions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
FREE FILE, INC. MR. STEPHEN M. RYAN undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mark Messmer, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us