H.R. 9134

H.R. 9134: To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to ensure that personally identifiable information provided in the Free Application for Federal Student Aid is not used for immigration enforcement, and for other purposes.

Introduced Emily Randall (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9134 aims to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to protect personally identifiable information submitted in the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA) from being used for immigration enforcement purposes. This means that information provided by students seeking federal financial aid cannot be accessed or utilized by immigration authorities to target individuals for immigration enforcement actions.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9134 argue that the bill is a crucial step in ensuring that undocumented students feel safe applying for financial aid without the fear of deportation. Advocates highlight that protecting student information encourages higher education access and equity, particularly for marginalized communities, and fosters an inclusive educational environment.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9134 express concerns that restricting the use of FAFSA information for immigration enforcement could undermine national security and public safety. Some opponents argue that the bill may incentivize illegal immigration by providing undocumented individuals with access to federal financial aid, potentially diverting resources away from citizens and lawful residents.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

The bill H.R. 9134 aims to protect personally identifiable information in the Free Application for Federal Student Aid from being used for immigration enforcement. The sponsor, Emily Randall, has significant financial backing from the health professionals industry, totaling $120 million, and from retired individuals, amounting to $37.5 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between these donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, indicating a low risk of conflicts of interest. The lack of industry connections related to education or immigration enforcement suggests that the motivations behind the sponsorship are not financially influenced by her donors. Voters should be aware that while campaign contributions can sometimes lead to conflicts, in this case, the financial support does not appear to intersect with the legislative intent of the bill.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Emily Randall, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us