H.R. 9164

H.R. 9164: To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to make grants to eligible entities to acquire and install milk storage-related equipment for use in elementary schools and secondary schools, an

Introduced Glenn Thompson (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9164 aims to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide grants to eligible entities, such as schools, for the acquisition and installation of milk storage-related equipment. This is intended to enhance milk storage capabilities in elementary and secondary schools.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9164 emphasize its potential to improve nutrition in schools by ensuring that milk is stored properly and remains safe for consumption. They argue that this investment could lead to better health outcomes for students and support local dairy farmers by increasing the demand for milk in school programs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9164 express concerns about the allocation of federal funds for equipment grants, suggesting that it may divert resources away from other pressing educational needs. Some argue that the bill does not address broader issues related to school nutrition programs and could lead to unnecessary spending on infrastructure rather than direct nutritional support.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$945,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

The bill H.R. 9164 aims to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to facilitate grants for milk storage equipment in schools. The sponsor, Glenn Thompson, has significant financial backing from the Health Professionals industry, totaling $720 million, and from the Retired category, amounting to $225 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between the interests of these donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. Given that the bill focuses on school nutrition and equipment, it does not appear to directly benefit the sponsor's top donor industries, which are more aligned with healthcare and retirement issues. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest is assessed as low.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Glenn Thompson, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $720,000,000
Individuals: $720,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $225,000,000
Individuals: $225,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us