H.R. 9238

H.R. 9238: To amend the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 to extend the authorities of title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, and for other purposes.

Introduced Eric Crawford (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9238 is a bill that extends the powers of Title VII of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) until July 2, 2026. This section primarily deals with electronic surveillance aimed at foreign targets outside the U.S. It allows for the collection of communications from non-U.S. individuals to gather foreign intelligence, which could incidentally include information about U.S. citizens. Under certain conditions, this information can be searched.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9238 argue that extending these surveillance authorities is essential for national security. They emphasize that the ability to monitor foreign communications helps protect the U.S. from threats and ensures the safety of its citizens. Proponents also highlight that the bill includes safeguards to protect the privacy of U.S. persons.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9238 express concerns about privacy and civil liberties, arguing that the bill could lead to overreach in surveillance practices. They worry about the incidental collection of data on U.S. citizens and the potential misuse of this information. Opponents call for stronger oversight and reforms to ensure that the rights of individuals are not compromised in the name of national security.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9238, sponsored by Eric Crawford, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning the FISA Amendments Act. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes various organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial interest in the bill's provisions. The largest disclosed lobbying amount comes from Cirrus Design Corporation, which contributed $40,000, but this does not indicate a conflict since it is unrelated to foreign intelligence surveillance. Overall, the lack of direct financial ties suggests minimal risk of conflicts of interest for voters to be concerned about.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CAPE BALLARD PARTNERS $120,000
NATIONAL ANIMAL SUPPLEMENT COUNCIL NATIONAL ANIMAL SUPPLEMENT COUNCIL $90,000
CIRRUS DESIGN CORPORATION ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC $40,000
SAFE ALLIANCE ADVANCED ENERGY ADVISORS $30,000
CLAIRITY, INC. POLSINELLI PC $30,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION DOUBLE HAUL STRATEGIES LLC $9,000
COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC undisclosed
FERRETLY INTERNATIONAL, INC. INVARIANT LLC undisclosed
PDE ACTION PDE ACTION undisclosed
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY FORDHAM UNIVERSITY undisclosed
XTREME CONCEPTS ROSS TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
SILICON RANCH ROSS TAYLOR & ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
WELLS FARGO HAAS STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
ORGANOVO HOLDINGS, INC. FKA: ORGANOVO, INC. POLSINELLI PC undisclosed
BREAS MEDICAL POLSINELLI PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us
Congressional Votes
On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass
House · Jun 11, 2026
Failed
198
YEA
218
NAY
15
NOT VOTING

Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.