H.R. 9310

H.R. 9310: Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2027

Introduced Mark Amodei (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9310 is a bill that outlines the funding and budget allocations for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for the fiscal year 2027. It likely includes provisions for various DHS functions, such as border security, immigration enforcement, cybersecurity, disaster response, and other critical areas of national security and public safety.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9310 may highlight the bill's potential to enhance national security through increased funding for border protection and disaster preparedness. Media outlets may focus on the importance of adequately funding the DHS to respond effectively to emerging threats and ensure the safety of American citizens.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9310 may express concerns about the allocation of funds, suggesting that it could lead to overreach in immigration enforcement or insufficient attention to civil liberties. Some media coverage might focus on the potential for increased spending without accountability, questioning the effectiveness of the proposed budget increases.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Economics and Public Finance

The analysis of H.R. 9310, the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2027, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Mark Amodei's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. Amodei's top donor industries include Health Professionals, contributing $240 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $75 million. While these industries are significant in terms of financial contributions, they do not directly relate to the appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security. Furthermore, the lobbying activity in this policy area does not indicate any direct influence from these donor industries on the bill's provisions. The total lobbying amounts are relatively modest compared to the overall financial contributions from Amodei's donors, suggesting limited potential conflicts of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
GRAND PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP LTD (FKA EAST OCEAN MEDICAL (HONG KONG) LIMITED) CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $90,000
PRIME POLICY GROUP ON BEHALF OF NEW HANOVER COUNTY, NC KH STRATEGIES $20,000
YAKAMA NATION MR. GEORGE WATERS $20,000
TORCH INDUSTRIES 1836 ADVISORS $18,000
AMGEN INC. WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP $5,000
CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER CONVENTUM GROUP, LLC undisclosed
FUEL ETHANOL DISRUPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER INCORPATED MR. AMIR GOULART SCHARIF undisclosed
FUEL ETHANOL DISRUPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER INCORPATED MR. AMIR GOULART SCHARIF undisclosed
BLACKSTONE CONSTRUCTION LLC WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP undisclosed
DENALI WATER SOLUTIONS WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYER ORGANIZATIONS (NAPEO) ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP undisclosed
RROMA COUNCIL RROMA COUNCIL undisclosed
BAJO COHEN AGLIANO, P.A. ON BEHALF OF HEALTH EDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
ERUDIO BIO, INC. BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
THE LOUIS D. BRANDEIS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER LAW THE LOUIS D. BRANDEIS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER LAW undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mark Amodei, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us