H.R. 9325 aims to create the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area in Texas, focusing on the conservation and protection of the natural, cultural, and recreational resources in the Upper and Middle Texas Gulf Coast. The bill seeks to promote the economic benefits associated with these resources by designating the area as part of the National Park System.
H.R. 9325 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Randy Weber (Republican) and is currently listed as “Introduced”. It is classified under the Public Lands and Natural Resources policy area, one of 157 bills in that area we track this Congress.
Randy Weber is the sponsor of 6 bills in our database this Congress, so H.R. 9325 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
Senate lobbying disclosures list 15 organizations lobbying on this bill’s issue area.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9325 4/10 (moderate risk), higher than 89% of analyzed bills; the average in Public Lands and Natural Resources is 2/10.
Supporters of H.R. 9325 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance environmental conservation efforts and promote tourism in the Texas Gulf Coast region. They highlight the importance of preserving natural habitats and cultural landmarks, which could lead to increased economic opportunities for local communities.
Critics of H.R. 9325 express concerns about the implications of federal control over land use and the potential restrictions on local development. Some argue that the designation could limit economic growth opportunities and impose additional regulations on landowners and businesses in the area.
While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity related to the bill raises some concerns. The National Motor Freight Traffic Association, which contributed $22,500, and Stevens Trucking, which contributed $30,000, are both involved in the freight and transportation sectors. These industries could potentially benefit from infrastructure or economic policies that may arise from the establishment of the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area. Additionally, the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas, contributing $45,000, may have interests in how conservation efforts could impact agricultural transport and trade. Although these connections are not direct, the substantial contributions from these industries warrant attention as they could influence the bill's outcomes.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. | MO STRATEGIES, INC. | $530,000 |
| TENCENT AMERICA LLC | MO STRATEGIES, INC. | $530,000 |
| BORDER TRADE ALLIANCE | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $60,000 |
| ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED | MO STRATEGIES, INC. | $60,000 |
| FRESH PRODUCE ASSOCIATION OF THE AMERICAS | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $45,000 |
| WERNER ENTERPRISES | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $45,000 |
| OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $45,000 |
| NATIONAL TANK TRUCK CARRIER, INC. | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $37,500 |
| STEVENS TRUCKING | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $30,000 |
| NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $22,500 |
| STARR-CAMARGO BRIDGE COMPANY | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $15,000 |
| STRAUNS CUSTOMHOUSE BROKERS, LLC | BC CONSULTING, LLC | $7,500 |
| CLEAN FREIGHT COALITION | MULLEN CONSULTING LLC | undisclosed |
| CITY OF ASHEBORO | CRANFILL SUMNER LLP | undisclosed |
| CITY OF ASHEBORO | CRANFILL SUMNER LLP | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
What does H.R. 9325 do?
H.R. 9325 aims to create the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area in Texas, focusing on the conservation and protection of the natural, cultural, and recreational resources in the Upper and Middle Texas Gulf Coast. The bill seeks to promote the economic benefits associated with these resources by designating the area as part of the National Park System.
Has H.R. 9325 received a floor vote?
No roll-call vote on H.R. 9325 is recorded in our database yet. Its current status is “Introduced”.
Does H.R. 9325 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9325 4/10 (moderate risk), higher than 89% of analyzed bills; the average in Public Lands and Natural Resources is 2/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of H.R. 9325?
H.R. 9325 is currently “Introduced” as of our last update on June 17, 2026.
Who sponsored H.R. 9325?
H.R. 9325 was sponsored by Randy Weber (Republican).
