H.R. 9472 aims to prohibit the allocation of Community Development Block Grant funding and federal mortgage support to municipalities that permit squatting, which is the unauthorized occupation of vacant properties. The bill seeks to discourage local governments from allowing this practice by cutting off federal financial assistance.
H.R. 9472 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Michael Lawler (Republican) and is currently listed as “Introduced”. It is classified under the Housing and Community Development policy area, one of 49 bills in that area we track this Congress.
Michael Lawler is the sponsor of 27 bills in our database this Congress, so H.R. 9472 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
Senate lobbying disclosures list 15 organizations lobbying on this bill’s issue area.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9472 3/10 (low risk), higher than 87% of analyzed bills; the average in Housing and Community Development is 2.3/10.
Supporters of H.R. 9472 argue that the bill will protect property rights and encourage municipalities to enforce laws against squatting. They believe that by withholding federal funding, the bill incentivizes local governments to maintain order and support responsible property management.
Critics of H.R. 9472 contend that the bill unfairly targets vulnerable populations who may resort to squatting due to housing insecurity. They argue that it could exacerbate homelessness and undermine community support systems, as municipalities may be forced to choose between federal funding and addressing the root causes of squatting.
While there are no direct industry overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, there is significant lobbying activity related to the bill's policy area. Notably, RESPOND-US contributed $140,000, and GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. contributed $60,000. These contributions suggest a vested interest in the outcomes of policies that could affect community development and housing. Although the bill specifically targets municipalities allowing squatting, the broader implications of restricting funding could indirectly affect various industries represented by these lobbyists. Voters should be aware that while direct conflicts are not evident, the substantial lobbying amounts indicate potential influences that may not align with community interests.
Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.
| Client | Lobbying Firm | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| RESPOND-US | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | $140,000 |
| SILVERLINING | ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. | $80,000 |
| MEDLINE | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | $80,000 |
| GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | $60,000 |
| AMERICAN FLOOD COALITION ACTION INC | ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. | $60,000 |
| PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION | CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. | $50,000 |
| LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES | CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC | $50,000 |
| MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE | CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC | $40,000 |
| LEO TECHNOLOGIES | BUTLER SNOW LLP | $30,000 |
| MAXIMUS | BRICK STREET STRATEGY | $30,000 |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | BRICK STREET STRATEGY | $30,000 |
| OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION | GTB PARTNERS | $20,000 |
| CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY | BUTLER SNOW LLP | $15,000 |
| HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION | HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| BASIS PATH | BUTLER SNOW LLP | undisclosed |
Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026
Top industries funding Michael Lawler, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
What does H.R. 9472 do?
H.R. 9472 aims to prohibit the allocation of Community Development Block Grant funding and federal mortgage support to municipalities that permit squatting, which is the unauthorized occupation of vacant properties. The bill seeks to discourage local governments from allowing this practice by cutting off federal financial assistance.
Has H.R. 9472 received a floor vote?
No roll-call vote on H.R. 9472 is recorded in our database yet. Its current status is “Introduced”.
Does H.R. 9472 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9472 3/10 (low risk), higher than 87% of analyzed bills; the average in Housing and Community Development is 2.3/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of H.R. 9472?
H.R. 9472 is currently “Introduced” as of our last update on July 1, 2026.
Who sponsored H.R. 9472?
H.R. 9472 was sponsored by Michael Lawler (Republican).
