H.R. 9521

H.R. 9521: To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend that date on which certain funds related to broadband infrastructure projects may be expended.

Introduced Addison McDowell (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9521 aims to extend the deadline for spending certain funds allocated for broadband infrastructure projects under Title VI of the Social Security Act. This extension would allow for more time to utilize these funds effectively to improve broadband access.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised H.R. 9521 for its potential to enhance broadband infrastructure, especially in underserved areas. Supporters argue that extending the funding deadline will enable more comprehensive project planning and execution, ultimately leading to better internet access for communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9521 have raised concerns that extending the deadline could lead to delays in broadband deployment, with some arguing that it may allow for mismanagement of funds. There are fears that this could stall progress in closing the digital divide, particularly in rural and low-income areas.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Science, Technology, Communications

The analysis of H.R. 9521 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning broadband infrastructure projects. The primary lobbying activity in this area comes from various organizations, including Vertex Pharmaceuticals and Verizon Communications, but these do not have a direct financial connection to the sponsor's top donors. The presence of lobbying activity indicates interest in the broadband sector, but without a direct link to the sponsor's financial backers, the risk of conflict remains low. Voters should be aware that while there are significant lobbying dollars in the broadband space, they do not appear to influence the sponsor directly through their donor network.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
SANOFI U.S. SERVICES, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
WAYFINDER GROUP (OBO RESEARCH CORPORATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII) RED MAPLE CONSULTING, LLC $40,000
ECKERD CONNECTS KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC $30,000
SMART APPROACHES TO MARIJUANA OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
FEDERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER COS OF JAPAN GEORGE H. DENISON $10,000
MAYO CLINIC MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP undisclosed
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG 12 CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
PAC-12 CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
SAPPHIRE DIGITAL MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Addison McDowell, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us