H.R. 9543

H.R. 9543: To amend the Act of July 5, 1884 to permit the imposition of taxes on vessels operating as tourist accommodations, and for other purposes.

Introduced Ed Case (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9543 aims to amend a law from 1884 to allow local governments to impose taxes on vessels that operate as tourist accommodations, such as houseboats or floating hotels. This change is intended to provide a new revenue stream for local jurisdictions that host these types of businesses.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9543 argue that the bill will help local governments generate much-needed revenue to support infrastructure and services that benefit both tourists and residents. They highlight the potential for improved funding for public services and the promotion of local tourism industries.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9543 express concerns that imposing taxes on tourist accommodation vessels could discourage tourism and negatively impact small businesses that rely on the tourism market. Some fear that the additional financial burden could lead to higher prices for visitors, potentially driving them away from these attractions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9543, which seeks to amend tax regulations on vessels operating as tourist accommodations, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Ed Case's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. Case's primary donor industries include Health Professionals and Retired individuals, contributing significant amounts of $240 million and $75 million respectively. These industries do not have a direct connection to the tourism or maritime sectors addressed in the bill. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in related areas, such as contributions from the Academy of Model Aeronautics and JetBlue Airways, these do not directly intersect with Case's donor base. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest is minimal, as the financial interests of the sponsor's donors do not align with the legislative focus of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $810,990
AMERICAN LEGION THE AMERICAN LEGION $190,000
ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
CALISTA CORPORATION CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION $50,000
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
PUGET SOUND ENERGY ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $30,000
KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INC BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC. $10,000
EXODIGO, LLC (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $10,000
TERAMIND, INC. (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE undisclosed
INTELSAT GENERAL CORPORATION VELOS undisclosed
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ed Case, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us