H.R. 9576 proposes the creation of the National Fraud Enforcement Division within the Department of Justice. This division is likely intended to enhance the federal government's ability to investigate, prosecute, and deter fraud-related crimes across various sectors, including financial fraud, healthcare fraud, and other fraudulent activities that impact consumers and the economy.
H.R. 9576 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Brad Finstad (Republican) and is currently listed as “Passed House”. It is classified under the Crime and Law Enforcement policy area, one of 235 bills in that area we track this Congress.
Brad Finstad is the sponsor of 10 bills in our database this Congress, so H.R. 9576 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
The most significant recorded vote (House, September 16, 2026) ended 352–72.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9576 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Crime and Law Enforcement is 2/10.
Supporters of H.R. 9576 have praised the bill as a necessary step to strengthen the federal government's efforts against fraud. They argue that establishing a dedicated division will lead to more effective law enforcement, protect consumers, and uphold the integrity of various industries. Advocates highlight the potential for increased coordination among agencies and improved resource allocation to combat fraud.
Critics of H.R. 9576 express concerns about the potential for bureaucratic expansion and the allocation of resources to a new division that may duplicate existing efforts. Some argue that the bill could lead to overreach in enforcement and raise questions about the efficiency of government intervention in fraud cases. There are also worries about the implications for small businesses and individuals who may face increased scrutiny.
The analysis of H.R. 9576, sponsored by Brad Finstad, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The primary donor industry is Health Professionals, contributing $120 million, which does not have a clear connection to the establishment of the National Fraud Enforcement Division of the Department of Justice. The second largest donor industry, Retired individuals, contributed $37.5 million, which is also unrelated to the bill's focus on fraud enforcement. Given the absence of overlapping interests, the risk of conflicts of interest appears to be minimal. Voters should be aware that while large donations can raise questions about influence, in this case, the lack of direct ties to the bill's subject matter suggests a lower risk of conflict.
Top industries funding Brad Finstad, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.
What does H.R. 9576 do?
H.R. 9576 proposes the creation of the National Fraud Enforcement Division within the Department of Justice. This division is likely intended to enhance the federal government's ability to investigate, prosecute, and deter fraud-related crimes across various sectors, including financial fraud, healthcare fraud, and other fraudulent activities that impact consumers and the economy.
How did Congress vote on H.R. 9576?
The most significant recorded vote (House, September 16, 2026) ended 352–72.
Does H.R. 9576 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9576 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Crime and Law Enforcement is 2/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of H.R. 9576?
H.R. 9576 is currently “Passed House” as of our last update on September 17, 2026.
Who sponsored H.R. 9576?
H.R. 9576 was sponsored by Brad Finstad (Republican).
