H.R. 9581

H.R. 9581: To establish a pilot program in the Department of Agriculture providing certain households with a monthly payment to purchase produce, to study the effect of such payments, and for other purposes.

Introduced Pramila Jayapal (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9581 aims to create a pilot program within the Department of Agriculture that provides specific households with monthly payments intended for purchasing fresh produce. The bill also seeks to study the impact of these payments on household nutrition and food security.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the potential benefits of H.R. 9581 in addressing food insecurity and promoting healthier eating habits among low-income households. Supporters argue that the program could lead to improved public health outcomes and reduced healthcare costs over time.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9581 have raised concerns about the program's funding and implementation, arguing that it may not effectively reach the intended recipients or that it could create dependency on government assistance. Some also question the long-term sustainability of such a pilot program.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The bill H.R. 9581 aims to establish a pilot program providing monthly payments to certain households for purchasing produce. The primary sponsor, Pramila Jayapal, has significant donor contributions from the health professionals industry, totaling $120 million. However, there is no direct overlap between the subject matter of the bill and the interests of her top donor industries, which primarily focus on health and retirement. This lack of direct industry connection suggests that the bill is unlikely to serve the financial interests of her donors directly. Additionally, the lobbying activity in the policy area does not indicate any significant influence from industries that would benefit from this bill, further reducing the risk of conflict of interest. Therefore, the overall risk score remains low, as the financial motivations of the sponsors' donors do not align with the bill's objectives.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC $60,000
CREA MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $60,000
VITUS MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
THE NRP GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
WENDOVER HOUSING PARTNERS MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
INLAND GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
CHURCHILL STATESIDE MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $20,000
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF PHANTOM NEURO INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
AAV, LTD. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
EXPLORER AIRCRAFT, INC. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF KTA-TATOR, INC. INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO GLOBAL BUSINESS TRAVEL ASSOCIATION DININO ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF MAIN LINE HEALTH INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Pramila Jayapal, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us