H.R. 9597

H.R. 9597: To designate the Civil War Defenses of Washington National Historical Park comprised of certain National Park System lands, and by affiliation and cooperative agreements other historically significant resources, located in the District of Colu

Introduced Eleanor Norton (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9597 aims to designate the Civil War Defenses of Washington as a national historical park. This designation would encompass certain lands within the National Park System as well as other historically significant resources in the District of Columbia through affiliations and cooperative agreements.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9597 highlight the importance of preserving Civil War history and enhancing public access to historical sites. They argue that this designation will promote education and tourism, benefiting the local economy and fostering a deeper understanding of the historical significance of the Civil War defenses in Washington.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9597 raise concerns about the potential for increased federal oversight and restrictions on land use. Some argue that the designation could lead to bureaucratic challenges that may hinder local development and impact the livelihoods of residents in the area.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The bill H.R. 9597, which focuses on designating the Civil War Defenses of Washington National Historical Park, does not have any direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Eleanor Norton's top donor industries, which include Health Professionals and Retired individuals. The total contributions from these sectors amount to $157,500,000, but they do not relate to the historical or park designation aspects of the bill. Furthermore, the lobbying activity present in this policy area primarily involves housing-related entities, which do not intersect with the bill's subject matter. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears minimal as the financial interests of the donors do not align with the objectives of the proposed legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC $60,000
CREA MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $60,000
COHNREZNICK LLP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $50,000
VITUS MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
THE NRP GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
WENDOVER HOUSING PARTNERS MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
INLAND GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
CHURCHILL STATESIDE MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $20,000
LIHC INVESTMENT CORP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF PHANTOM NEURO INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
AAV, LTD. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
EXPLORER AIRCRAFT, INC. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF KTA-TATOR, INC. INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Eleanor Norton, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us