H.R. 9598

H.R. 9598: To prohibit the use of Federal, State, foreign, or private funds to install permanent fencing around Lafayette Square.

Introduced Eleanor Norton (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9598 is a bill that aims to prevent the use of any funds—whether from federal, state, foreign, or private sources—to build permanent fencing around Lafayette Square, which is located adjacent to the White House in Washington, D.C. This legislation suggests an effort to maintain open access to the area and prevent long-term barriers.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 9598 for its commitment to preserving public access to Lafayette Square, viewing it as a step towards maintaining the area as a symbol of openness and democracy. Supporters argue that the bill reflects a dedication to civil liberties and the importance of public spaces in a democratic society.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9598 have expressed concerns that prohibiting fencing could compromise security in the area, particularly in light of recent events that have raised safety issues around the White House. Some media reports highlight fears that this bill may undermine efforts to protect both the public and the presidential grounds from potential threats.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The analysis of H.R. 9598, which aims to prohibit the use of funds for installing permanent fencing around Lafayette Square, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Eleanor Norton's top donor industries. Norton's primary financial support comes from the Health Professionals sector, contributing $120 million, and the Retired sector, contributing $37.5 million. Given that these industries do not have a direct stake in the legislation concerning fencing, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. Voters should be aware that while the funding sources are substantial, they do not correlate with the bill's focus, indicating a low risk of undue influence from donors on this specific issue.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC. $240,000
NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $80,000
IAC SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $60,000
BALANCE OF NATURE AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $45,000
ML STRATEGIES, LLC (ON BEHALF OF DAIKIN U.S. CORPORATION) PLURUS STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $30,000
SONOVA USA. INC. AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $30,000
THE MCKEON GROUP INC. (ON BEHALF OF D-WAVE GOVERNMENT INC.) PLURUS STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
GLOBAL ARM PLURUS STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
NLMK PENNSYLVANIA SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS $10,000
THE BENNETT GROUP DC ON BEHALF OF ENEXOR BIOENERGY AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP $10,000
THE CORMAC GROUP, ON BEHALF OF TENDO AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP undisclosed
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE (API) KELLER AND HECKMAN, LLP undisclosed
LASSEN PEAK, INC. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS undisclosed
'INTERNET OF EVERYTHING CORP. (FKA QUISNET). AMERICAN CAPITOL GROUP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Eleanor Norton, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us