H.R. 9601

H.R. 9601: To direct the United States Trade Representative to initiate investigations to determine whether foreign countries, including Canada, have ceased importation and distribution of alcoholic beverage exports of the United States in a manner that

Introduced Claudia Tenney (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9601 directs the United States Trade Representative to investigate whether foreign countries, including Canada, have stopped importing and distributing alcoholic beverages from the United States. The goal of the bill is to assess the impact of these actions on U.S. exports and potentially address any trade barriers.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 9601 for taking a proactive approach to protect U.S. exporters and ensuring fair trade practices. Supporters argue that the bill could help strengthen the U.S. alcohol industry and maintain its competitiveness in international markets.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9601 have raised concerns that the bill may escalate trade tensions with Canada and other countries, potentially leading to retaliatory measures. Some commentators worry that the investigations could distract from more pressing trade issues and create unnecessary bureaucracy.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$472,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Foreign Trade and International Finance

The analysis of H.R. 9601, sponsored by Claudia Tenney, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter—investigating foreign countries' importation of U.S. alcoholic beverages—and the sponsor's top donor industries, which include Health Professionals and Retired individuals. The total contributions from these sectors amount to $472,500,000, with no evident financial ties to the alcoholic beverage industry or foreign trade matters. This lack of overlap suggests minimal risk of conflicts of interest related to the bill's objectives.

Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the housing sector related to this bill, it does not directly connect to the primary focus of the legislation. The lobbying amounts from various organizations total $270,000, but they are primarily associated with housing and not with trade or alcohol exports. Therefore, voters can be reassured that the potential for conflicts of interest is low, as the financial interests of the sponsor's donors do not intersect with the bill's provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO LEWIS-BURKE ASSOCIATES, LLC $60,000
CREA MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $60,000
COHNREZNICK LLP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $50,000
VITUS MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
THE NRP GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
WENDOVER HOUSING PARTNERS MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
INLAND GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
CHURCHILL STATESIDE MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $20,000
HOUSING ADVISORY GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
THE WISHCAMPER COMPANIES MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
LIHC INVESTMENT CORP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $10,000
ONESTREET RESIDENTIAL MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $7,500
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF PHANTOM NEURO INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Claudia Tenney, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $360,000,000
Individuals: $360,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $112,500,000
Individuals: $112,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us