H.R. 9645

H.R. 9645: Health Care Price Certainty for All Americans Act

Reported by Committee Jason Smith (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Health Care Price Certainty for All Americans Act aims to provide greater transparency and predictability regarding health care costs for consumers. It likely includes measures to regulate or standardize pricing in the health care system, ensuring that Americans can better understand and anticipate their medical expenses.

Positive Media Summary

Many media outlets have praised the Health Care Price Certainty for All Americans Act for its potential to empower consumers by providing clearer information about health care costs. Supporters argue that this legislation could reduce unexpected medical bills and enhance competition among providers, ultimately leading to lower prices for patients.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the Health Care Price Certainty for All Americans Act have raised concerns that it may not effectively address the underlying issues of high health care costs. Some commentators argue that the bill could lead to increased administrative burdens for health care providers and may not be sufficient to ensure meaningful price reductions for consumers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9645 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Jason Smith's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on health care price certainty. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes contributions from various organizations, but none are directly linked to the health care industry, which diminishes the potential for conflicts of interest. The largest contributions come from organizations like the Veterans Association of Real Estate Professionals ($30,000) and Sightline Intelligence ($50,000), neither of which has a clear connection to health care pricing. Therefore, the risk of conflicts arising from the sponsor's financial backers is minimal, as the primary interests represented do not align with the health care sector.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SIGHTLINE INTELLIGENCE C2 STRATEGIES $50,000
OMEGA PROJECT COMPANY C2 STRATEGIES $50,000
ACTUS ADVANCED SYSTEMS C2 STRATEGIES $40,000
VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS, INC. C2 STRATEGIES $30,000
EO SOLUTIONS LLC PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
ULINE BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES $20,000
TONIX PHARMACEUTICALS BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES $20,000
RTC SOUTHERN NEVADA PORTER GROUP, LLC $10,000
WISH BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN STATE CRANBERRY GROWERS ASSOCIATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WD SCHORSCH LLC BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
STATE USE PROGRAMS ASSOCIATION (SUPRA) PORTER GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jason Smith, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $360,000,000
Individuals: $360,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $112,500,000
Individuals: $112,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us