H.R. 9706

H.R. 9706: To require operators of wagering or prediction market platforms to use facial recognition technology to verify the age of users of such wagering or prediction market platforms, and for other purposes.

Introduced Josh Gottheimer (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9706 is a bill that mandates operators of wagering or prediction market platforms to implement facial recognition technology to verify the age of their users. The primary goal is to ensure that only individuals of legal age can participate in these platforms, which are often associated with gambling and betting activities.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9706 argue that the bill enhances consumer protection by preventing underage individuals from accessing wagering and prediction markets. Advocates praise the use of advanced technology like facial recognition for its potential to improve age verification processes and promote responsible gambling.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9706 express concerns about privacy and civil liberties, arguing that the use of facial recognition technology could lead to invasive surveillance practices. There are also worries about the accuracy of such technology and the potential for discrimination, as well as the implications of requiring users to submit biometric data to participate in online betting.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9706 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Josh Gottheimer's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning wagering or prediction market platforms. The lobbying activity in this policy area does not indicate significant financial influence from industries directly related to the bill. The largest contributions come from organizations like Healthequity, Inc. and Mathematica, Inc., which are not directly linked to wagering or facial recognition technology. This lack of direct financial ties suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists in the broader context, it does not appear to directly impact this specific legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ACADEMY OF HOME CARE MEDICINE TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $70,000
MATHEMATICA, INC TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $60,000
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM $60,000
ACTUM ON BEHALF OF HEALTHEQUITY, INC. TARPLIN, DOWNS & YOUNG, LLC $50,000
COALITION FOR THE USE OF SAFE AND EFFICIENT REFRIGERANTS WILLIAMSON LAW + POLICY PLLC $20,000
JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP $10,000
NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CONSUMER REPORTING ASSOCIATION $5,000
ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) ASSOCIATION FOR MATERIALS PROTECTION AND PERFORMANCE (AMPP) undisclosed
SYSTEMS & METHODS, INC. CAPROCK STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
HEALING LODGE OF THE SEVEN NATIONS HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
PUEBLO OF SANTA ANA HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
TIGERSWAN ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
LWRC INTERNATIONAL, LLC ALPHA STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIVE VILLAGE OF EYAK HOBBS, STRAUS, DEAN & WALKER, LLP undisclosed
HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HEALTHCARE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Josh Gottheimer, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us