H.R. 9736

H.R. 9736: To provide appropriations for the Internal Revenue Service to overhaul technology and strengthen enforcement, and for other purposes.

Introduced Suzan DelBene (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9736 is a bill introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 16, 2026, aiming to allocate funds to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for modernizing its technology systems and enhancing its enforcement capabilities. The bill has been referred to the House Committee on Appropriations for further consideration.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9736 argue that investing in the IRS's technological infrastructure will lead to more efficient tax processing and improved taxpayer services. They believe that strengthening enforcement will help close the tax gap by ensuring compliance, thereby increasing federal revenue without raising taxes.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the bill express concerns that increased enforcement measures could lead to overreach and unnecessary audits, particularly affecting middle- and lower-income taxpayers. They also question the effectiveness of allocating additional funds to the IRS, suggesting that the agency should first address existing inefficiencies before receiving more resources.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9736, which focuses on appropriations for the Internal Revenue Service to improve technology and enforcement, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Suzan DelBene's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes significant contributions from various organizations, such as the American College of Emergency Physicians, which contributed $498,299. However, these contributions do not directly relate to the IRS's technology and enforcement initiatives. The absence of direct industry connections suggests that there are minimal risks of conflicts of interest, as the funding sources do not appear to have a vested interest in the bill's outcomes.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS $498,299
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND $150,000
COLLIER COLLECTIVE, LLC MCCOLL STRATEGIES LLC $40,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
PANO AI PANO AI $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
PSEG SERVICES CORPORATION TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
COUNTY OF NAPA PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
LAKE COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NEVADA COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
HUMBOLDT COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATORS PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
NATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
CLARK COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Suzan DelBene, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $840,000,000
Individuals: $840,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $262,500,000
Individuals: $262,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us