H.R. 9740

H.R. 9740: To establish a Critical Materials Processing Technology Testbed Capability, and for other purposes.

Introduced Bill Foster (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9740 aims to create a testing facility dedicated to developing and improving technologies for processing critical materials. This facility would support innovation and research in the extraction and utilization of materials essential for various industries, particularly those related to technology and renewable energy.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the bill as a significant step towards enhancing U.S. capabilities in critical materials processing. Supporters argue that establishing a testbed will foster innovation, reduce dependence on foreign sources, and strengthen the domestic supply chain for essential materials.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have raised concerns that the bill may lead to excessive government spending and question the effectiveness of creating a new testbed. Some media outlets have highlighted potential environmental impacts associated with increased processing activities and have called for more stringent regulations before advancing such initiatives.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

The analysis of H.R. 9740, which aims to establish a Critical Materials Processing Technology Testbed Capability, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Bill Foster's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity in related areas, such as the $1,100,000 from the American Dental Association and $70,000 from Cellebrite Inc., these contributions do not directly relate to critical materials processing or technology. The absence of direct financial ties between the bill's objectives and the sponsor's donors suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not appear to influence the specific legislative intent of this bill significantly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION $1,100,000
CELLEBRITE INC. CELLEBRITE INC. $70,000
ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE ANIMAL HEALTH INSTITUTE $55,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE $25,000
AMERICAN CONCRETE PIPE ASSOCIATION EDMUND GRABER $20,000
MATERIALS RESEARCH SOCIETY HILLSTAFFER, LLC $15,000
NAFA FLEET MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION HILLSTAFFER, LLC $15,000
BETTENDORF IA EDMUND GRABER $10,000
NATIONAL UTILITY CONTRACTORS ASSN EDMUND GRABER $10,000
ILLINOIS PUBLIC TRANSIT ASSN EDMUND GRABER $10,000
NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION NATIONAL COOPERATIVE BUSINESS ASSOCIATION undisclosed
FMC CORPORATION RED FLAG CONSULTING USA(FORMALLY KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS-GOVERNMENT COUNSELLORS, INC) undisclosed
ASSOCIATION FOR DIPLOMATIC STUDIES AND TRAINING HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed
THE ETHYLENE OXIDE STERILIZATION ASSOCIATION, INC HILLSTAFFER, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Bill Foster, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us