H.R. 9742

H.R. 9742: To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate certain exceptions to the naturalization requirement as to understanding the English language, history, principles, and form of government of the United States.

Introduced Brandon Gill (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9742 aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act by removing specific exceptions to the requirement that applicants for U.S. naturalization demonstrate an understanding of the English language, as well as knowledge of U.S. history, principles, and government structure.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9742 argue that the bill strengthens the naturalization process by ensuring that all applicants have a fundamental understanding of American values and civic responsibilities, which can enhance integration into society.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9742 contend that the bill may create unnecessary barriers for immigrants, particularly those who may struggle with language or have different educational backgrounds, potentially leading to discrimination against certain groups seeking citizenship.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9742, which seeks to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act regarding naturalization requirements, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor, Brandon Gill's top donor industries. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes various organizations, but none appear to have a direct interest in immigration or naturalization policies. For instance, donations from organizations like Saildrone Inc. and the Environmental Defense Fund focus on technology and environmental issues, respectively, which do not intersect with immigration policy. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low, as there is no evident financial incentive for the sponsor to favor specific donor interests in this legislative context.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $410,042
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $377,725
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. $158,589
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION $150,000
SBIR CONSORTIUM JOHN WILLIAMS $30,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS $30,000
SEEING MACHINES GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC $30,000
MIDDLE EAST FORUM MIDDLE EAST FORUM $20,000
SHEA'S O'CONNELL PRESERVATION GUILD LTD. D/B/A SHEA'S PERFORMING ARTS CENTER MASIELLO MARTUCCI HUGHES KULPA $15,000
ATA ACTION RS GROUP CONSULTING LLC $6,000
END SEPSIS CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
TECHNEST SOLUTIONS S.L.A. DBA FORTRIS ON BEHALF OF NEXUSONE CONSULTING CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
SBCC EQUIPMENT DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brandon Gill, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us