H.R. 9914

H.R. 9914: To establish the applicability of antitrust laws to the sharing of artificial intelligence frontier model risks, and for other purposes.

Introduced Robert Latta (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9914 aims to clarify that antitrust laws apply to the sharing of risks associated with frontier artificial intelligence models. This means that companies involved in developing or using advanced AI technologies must consider antitrust regulations when sharing information about potential risks, ensuring fair competition and preventing monopolistic practices in the AI sector.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9914 argue that the bill is a necessary step to ensure accountability and transparency in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence. By applying antitrust laws to AI risk sharing, the legislation is seen as a proactive measure to protect consumers and promote healthy competition among tech companies.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9914 express concerns that the bill may stifle innovation in the AI industry. They argue that imposing antitrust regulations on risk sharing could hinder collaboration among companies working on advanced AI technologies, potentially slowing down progress and leading to less robust safety measures.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of H.R. 9914, which addresses the applicability of antitrust laws to artificial intelligence, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Robert Latta's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity in the AI and technology sectors, the top donor contributions do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on AI frontier model risks. The largest lobbying contributions come from CorMedix Inc. ($220,000) and the Telecommunications Industry Association ($70,000), but these do not indicate a direct financial interest in the outcomes of this specific legislation. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest appears low, as the financial ties do not suggest a direct influence over the bill's provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CORMEDIX INC. CORMEDIX INC. $220,000
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE $180,000
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $70,000
TERRANOVA INC FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
POSEIDON AEROSPACE FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
SAALEX CORPORATION FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
HERTHA METALS FRONTERA GROUP $15,000
MN8 ENERGY LLC MN8 ENERGY LLC $15,000
RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $10,000
VERMONT CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $8,000
AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURERS COALITION WILEY REIN LLP undisclosed
UNCAC COALITION UNCAC COALITION undisclosed
CFA INSTITUTE CFA INSTITUTE undisclosed
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA STUDENT ASSOCIATION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA STUDENT ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Robert Latta, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $480,000,000
Individuals: $480,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $150,000,000
Individuals: $150,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us