H.R. 9944 aims to allow individuals who have been granted temporary protected status (TPS) to challenge and seek judicial review of decisions to terminate their TPS status. This bill is intended to provide a legal avenue for those affected to contest changes in their immigration status that could affect their ability to remain in the U.S.
H.R. 9944 was introduced in the 119th Congress by Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Democrat) and is currently listed as “Introduced”. It is classified under the Immigration policy area, one of 129 bills in that area we track this Congress.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the sponsor of 11 bills in our database this Congress, so H.R. 9944 is part of a broader legislative agenda rather than a one-off proposal.
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9944 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Immigration is 2.9/10.
Supporters of H.R. 9944 argue that the bill is a crucial step in protecting vulnerable immigrant communities who rely on TPS for safety and stability in the U.S. They highlight its potential to ensure fair treatment and due process for individuals facing the threat of deportation due to TPS terminations.
Critics of H.R. 9944 express concern that the bill could undermine immigration enforcement and complicate the process of managing temporary protected status. Some argue that it may lead to prolonged legal battles and increased uncertainty regarding immigration policies.
The analysis of H.R. 9944, which aims to authorize judicial review of temporary protected status terminations, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the subject matter of the bill and the top donor industries of sponsor Debbie Wasserman Schultz. This indicates a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from financial contributions. The absence of relevant donor industries suggests that the motivations behind the bill are not influenced by the financial interests of her top contributors. For instance, Wasserman Schultz's top donor industries include sectors that do not directly relate to immigration or judicial review processes, which are central to this legislation. Therefore, the potential for conflicts of interest is minimal, and the integrity of the legislative process appears intact. Voters should be aware that while campaign contributions can sometimes create perceived conflicts, in this case, the data indicates a clear separation between donor interests and the bill's objectives.
Top industries funding Debbie Wasserman Schultz, ranked by total contributions.
Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)
What does H.R. 9944 do?
H.R. 9944 aims to allow individuals who have been granted temporary protected status (TPS) to challenge and seek judicial review of decisions to terminate their TPS status. This bill is intended to provide a legal avenue for those affected to contest changes in their immigration status that could affect their ability to remain in the U.S.
Has H.R. 9944 received a floor vote?
No roll-call vote on H.R. 9944 is recorded in our database yet. Its current status is “Introduced”.
Does H.R. 9944 have a conflict of interest?
Our conflict-of-interest analysis rates H.R. 9944 2/10 (low risk), higher than 76% of analyzed bills; the average in Immigration is 2.9/10. This score reflects overlap between the sponsor’s campaign funding, lobbying activity, and the industries the bill affects. It is a transparency indicator, not an accusation.
What is the status of H.R. 9944?
H.R. 9944 is currently “Introduced” as of our last update on July 28, 2026.
Who sponsored H.R. 9944?
H.R. 9944 was sponsored by Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Democrat).
